SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
IMDS nasdaq bulletin board
An SI Board Since January 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4122 23 0 IMDS
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3597 Is there a concern that CTML equipment will cost about 50% more than mammyo equLabrador-7/24/1999
3596 check out cust for a company for a company similar to imds: no revenues, incrgao seng-7/20/1999
3595 Start Routine Mammograms at Age 50, Not Age 40 drkoop.com exclusive drkoop.cogao seng-7/20/1999
3594 In the event that the Company issues convertible Preferred Stock or convertiblegao seng-7/19/1999
3593 I am inserting this article because it seems to me that it identifies a frightegao seng-7/18/1999
3592 it's like this. everything you guys say is scary. the things that could pgao seng-7/16/1999
3591 xth try: so the if the price tries to approach 0, the number of shares requiredgao seng-7/16/1999
3590 To all: Preferred Stock has 4 features Cumulative Participation Call Conversiogao seng-7/15/1999
3589 speaking of warrants, ISWI got some cheap ones at 3/16. I was watching McLaughgao seng-7/14/1999
3588 Yes, but they paid for that right for a finite number of shares. All I am sayigao seng-7/14/1999
3587 The parties who own the convertible preferred shares can convert at their will Labrador-7/14/1999
3586 if you read the paragraph before and after the one you posted (italicized), yougao seng-7/14/1999
3585 >>Lab - I suppose on your side of the fence you don't think the compLabrador-7/14/1999
3584 Lab - I suppose on your side of the fence you don't think the company is atgao seng-7/14/1999
3583 I must admit over the past couple of years, I have been pessimistic -- having wLabrador-7/14/1999
3582 Lab, I feel that you have been a fair minded naysayer. But suggesting that 10gao seng-7/14/1999
3581 I'd say the gross margin would be higher than 25%, but the net under 25%, sLabrador-7/14/1999
3580 Reuters: The company said it may try to challenge the mammography's dominangao seng-7/14/1999
3579 Priceguy, I USED to think they had a legitimate product. Now I'm not sBenoit Desrochers-7/14/1999
3578 What is your opinion of the announced trials? Do you feel there is a possibilipriceguy-7/14/1999
3577 Check out today's Wall Street Journal, Section A, Column 6 addressing brokeLabrador-7/14/1999
3576 Watch out for the pump-and-dump!! Readers of this board are too smart, right? Labrador-7/13/1999
3575 IMDS Phase 2 release: biz.yahoo.comtonto-7/13/1999
3574 I must be jaded in my views here, but any chance that the company tips off thesLabrador-7/12/1999
3573 Flood gates seem to have opened. Private investors have sold off chunks beforeBenoit Desrochers-7/12/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):