SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Nanotech Stocks to Watch
An SI Board Since March 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1411 167 0 NNZ
Emcee:  StockJock-e Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
36MJ: I did see a recommendation for TINY out of NY. The analyst was kind enoughDan P-4/26/2003
35Hey folks: Do you think the Forbes subscription is worth it? Any of you own thDan P-4/26/2003
34Here is part of the Nanotech. What stood out for me was that DOW and IBM are coMJ-4/14/2003
33Yes, I subscribe. He is technically oriented and not fundamentally oriented. MJ-4/13/2003
32do you subscribe to Granville ??? how is his track record ...quasi-geezer-4/13/2003
31No have not bought any of their recommendations. Also, truly sidetracked with oMJ-4/13/2003
30almost 3 weeks have passed since you get the nano-report, have you profit from iquasi-geezer-4/13/2003
29Thanks for the reference. Finally, I have the first copy of Nanotech report. MJ-3/26/2003
28dude, I can tell you from the technical side stockcharts.com[w,a]daclyyay[dd][pfarkarooski-3/5/2003
27zetazeta Okay, I did the subscription. Like I need this---will see. The letteMJ-3/5/2003
26no position at this time ... war looming, staying on the sideline for now ...farkarooski-3/3/2003
25Rather ambitious. Do you have a position in TINY? mjMJ-3/3/2003
24<<Will test the waters with TINY.>> are you going to pick up a coupfarkarooski-3/2/2003
23<<Will test the waters with TINY.>> are you going to pick up a coupfarkarooski-3/2/2003
22I like TINY also. Veco has been recommended previously by technical letter I sMJ-3/2/2003
21dude, have you sent in the money yet, hurry up before they raise the price ... farkarooski-3/1/2003
20Trying to analyze these stocks makes my head swim. The concept for Tiny I likeMJ-2/27/2003
19would they still talk to you if you have one of the following occupation:<b&gfarkarooski-2/25/2003
18Ofcourse they talk to you... if you claim you are a VC looking for some investmeStockJock-e-2/25/2003
17<<I have been meaning to drop by and get their opinion on a couple of thinfarkarooski-2/25/2003
16There is a fair bit of Nanotech action in Toronto... thanks for that article. ThStockJock-e-2/25/2003
15No doubt it will be a big sector, but like the other poster said, the big moves StockJock-e-2/25/2003
14Canada Scientists Warn of Brewing Nanotech Battle Thu Feb 13, 7:30 PM ET By Rajfarkarooski-2/25/2003
13I think there is no point in playing with the big stock because the nanotechnogyfarkarooski-2/25/2003
12Have spent a reasonable amount of time on the net learning about nano research. MJ-2/25/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):