SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Employee Stock Options - NQSOs & ISOs
An SI Board Since June 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
786 22 0
Emcee:  rkral Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromPosted
36Huey - You are missing my philosophical point - of course there are reconciliatiClarksterh6/13/2002
35<i>cash flow should never be adjusted</i> There are lots of items thueyone6/13/2002
34Ron - <i>Does that mean you and Huey have agreed that the Cash Flow StatemClarksterh6/13/2002
33Clark -- thanks for visiting the thread and posting here -- >><i>I rkral6/13/2002
32Huey - Ok, now you are making me think. I'll have to get back to you on thiClarksterh6/13/2002
31<i>It will be interesting to see the details of Standard & Poor's hueyone6/13/2002
30>><i>Maybe you can do the math for yourself at this point and figurerkral6/13/2002
29<i>CONCLUSIONS: The tax benefit does not tell the entire story. "Tax hueyone6/13/2002
28Hi Clark: Regarding the assertion that you have made several times--- that expehueyone6/13/2002
27Good diagram Ron. <i>4) the net for mr market is what it is.</i> .Stock Farmer6/12/2002
26Cash Is King, but Options Still Play Key Role in Compensation Elliot Sirota canD. K. G.6/12/2002
25Change "mr market" to "shareholder(s)" .. Recommend the aborkral6/12/2002
24<i> ... the difference ... between NQSOs and ISOs?</i> Going from mrkral6/12/2002
23<i>Fidelity Uses Voting Threats To Fight Excessive CEO Pay</i> onlhueyone6/12/2002
22<i>CONCLUSIONS: The tax benefit does not tell the entire story. "Tax hueyone6/12/2002
21As you said, for SEBL FY2001: FACT 1: Employee compensation implied by the &quorkral6/12/2002
20Here is a direct link to the Siebel Proxy on a PDF format. The info regarding ehueyone6/11/2002
19Hi Ron: I haven't had a chance to try your value flow diagram yet. I have hueyone6/11/2002
18>><i>I ended up with was a 145.4 million pre tax stock option expensrkral6/11/2002
17<I>If the company sold the same shares to the public and then used the monhueyone6/11/2002
16A "value flow" diagram for the option exercise. Huey, I recently sketrkral6/11/2002
15<i>If the company sold the same shares to the public and then used the monClarksterh6/11/2002
14Hi Clark: If the company sold the same shares to the public and then used the mhueyone6/11/2002
13Ouch. Probably worse, because she had expectations and had probably built plansUncle Frank6/11/2002
12<i>I think viewing the intrinsic value (market price minus exercise price)Clarksterh6/11/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):