SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Cadre Resources (CSL.V) Awaiting production #'s and Financ
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1285 22 0 CSL
Emcee:  Francis R. Biscan Jr. Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
360 Dan, Hope doubling the rutile to 106.6 lb gets the stock price back up ;) CrankBob Jagow-7/30/1997
359 ®If it is 1.5 vol% rutile, then 106.6 lb is correct¯ You're righPianoman1997-7/30/1997
358 Rich, See my response to Dan. Re your calculation, "I take 2000 lbs and mBob Jagow-7/30/1997
357 Dan, Your figure of 56.1 lb/m^3 assumes the ore is 1.5 wt% rutile, not the 1.5 Bob Jagow-7/30/1997
356 This is what I'm getting: Per cubic meter: 1 m3= 10 dm x 10 dm x 10 dm =1Pianoman1997-7/30/1997
355 >> bulk density/true density = 1.7/2.2 = 77%,<< Thanks for all thaFrancis R. Biscan Jr.-7/30/1997
354 Rich, I get 106.6lb rutile/m^3. This is based on 1-Total lb/m^3 = 1.7*100^3/4Bob Jagow-7/30/1997
353 Claude: Are you still following CSL? I'm curious to know your opinion on TrueScouse-7/29/1997
352 >> IM only a lurker but here are some good info:<< Thanks Dan RiFrancis R. Biscan Jr.-7/29/1997
351 >> Just enter the first (or second) half and you'll get to the web siFrancis R. Biscan Jr.-7/29/1997
350 >>For rutile, Merck shows 4.23g/cc and my old CRC Handbook shows 4.26.<Francis R. Biscan Jr.-7/29/1997
349 Rich, PMFJI on this thread where IM only a lurker but here are some good info: Pianoman1997-7/29/1997
348 Rich, For rutile, Merck shows 4.23g/cc and my old CRC Handbook shows 4.26. OtheBob Jagow-7/29/1997
347 Looks lke I had it doubled, Rich, try southafrica.net BobBob Jagow-7/29/1997
346 Hello Rich The URL repeated itself twice on the same line. Just enter the firstBrian777-7/29/1997
345 Bob..........Could you also, as a chemist, find the density of Rutile and IlmenFrancis R. Biscan Jr.-7/29/1997
344 >> Also found a brief mention of S. African mining of Ti beach sands.<Francis R. Biscan Jr.-7/29/1997
343 >>the '96 price for rutile was $650/ton fob OZ. I might be able to chFrancis R. Biscan Jr.-7/29/1997
342 Rich, Also found a brief mention of S. African mining of Ti beach sands. southBob Jagow-7/29/1997
341 Rich, I can't find the early references to titanium here, but it looks to mBob Jagow-7/29/1997
340 >> Will have to wander to S10 to see if he has uploaded the updated versiFrancis R. Biscan Jr.-7/28/1997
339 Howy, His post today was probably from the SS. Will have to wander to S10 to seBob Jagow-7/28/1997
338 Bob: <<Think we need one of your blue-sky (a la IPM) estimates>> TrueScouse-7/28/1997
337 Brian, To follow up on PR sources, I just received the 7/28 PR (Carlessi agreemBob Jagow-7/28/1997
336 Rich, Are you sure you haven't been spending too much time with C.L over aDean M. Grogger-7/28/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):