SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
2000 Date-Change Problem: Scam, Hype, Hoax, Fraud
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1361 14 0
Emcee:  Bill Wexler Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
361 You convinced me. I'll be cowering with fear in some dark corner the eveniBill Wexler-11/18/1997
360 Bill Wexler, Read your intro post for this thread. You amuse me. techstocks.C.K. Houston-11/18/1997
359 Bill, ALYD, another piece of trash? will check! biz.yahoo.com PanchoPancho Villa-11/15/1997
358 Bill >>DDIM is a complete piece of trash. Much like Zitel<< As youPancho Villa-11/15/1997
357 DDIM is a complete piece of trash. Much like Zitel, it is simply a vehicle to Bill Wexler-11/15/1997
356 Bill, We miss you over at Rogers. I guess I will come get you here. I read thPancho Villa-11/15/1997
355 ...and a very small business at that.Bill Wexler-11/11/1997
354 BW - Have been away for a while. The thread's unrecognizable. As is the Y2PaulM-11/11/1997
353 Bill - <i> Seems sort of silly to speculate on Y2K stocks then....doesn&David Eddy-11/9/1997
352 <<a very real problem with explaining Y2K issues is that there is astonisBill Wexler-11/9/1997
351 Daniel/Dan Allen - <i> My recommendation: trust no one who offers no eviDavid Eddy-11/9/1997
350 Daniel - <i>this quote from the North site</i> That Gary North siDavid Eddy-11/9/1997
349 David, maybe this quote from the North site could offer some insight to BillDaniel-11/9/1997
348 Bill - Good to 'see' you again. <i>Interesting that Y2K believeDavid Eddy-11/7/1997
347 Interesting that Y2K believers don't apply the same skepticism to dubious cBill Wexler-11/6/1997
346 I do not have the link, but I believe a copy of this survey is available onlineJumper-11/5/1997
345 Jumper - [from Hove's testimony] <i>The FDIC and state authorities David Eddy-11/5/1997
344 I hear they used napkins David. Gartner & the Fat Canadian on the other hJumper-11/5/1997
343 Bill - <i>An FDIC survey of data processing vendors to banks found less David Eddy-11/5/1997
342 Y2K - the nonevent of the millenium biz.yahoo.comBill Wexler-11/4/1997
341 And so it shall be. Use your leased words wisely, grasshopper. - JeffJeffrey S. Mitchell-11/4/1997
340 Fine, yet place thyself on official notice that henceforth the phrase "Y2KJumper-11/4/1997
339 Check this out!!! One of my "fans" sent me some email recently in reBill Wexler-11/3/1997
338 Jumper, please be informed that "Y2K" is now a registered trademark oJeffrey S. Mitchell-10/30/1997
337 >> "It's not the cost of doing it, but of not doing it," &Done, gone.-10/29/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):