SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread.
An SI Board Since May 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
5425 101 0
Emcee:  Shoot1st Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3625Looks like the "trust me" crowd is spreading its manure in fear of therrufff-4/21/2005
3624<i>Whatsup with that?</i> Shows the difference between facts and Janravenseye-4/21/2005
3623Just can't get past the BW thing can you Ravy...Everyone else has years ago.yardslave-4/21/2005
3622<i>And unlike you, we also know how to separate fact from fantasy.</i&gravenseye-4/21/2005
3621More from Mark cuban's webblog. Jeff, the censor, likes to cite just posts rrufff-4/20/2005
3620Excellent response to Mark Cuban siding with the "trust us" crowd. Porrufff-4/20/2005
3619Pretty amazing how the cowardly yardslave to gurus now has time to posterior kisrrufff-4/20/2005
3618I wonder if he actually has to try that hard, or if it just comes naturally? &lyardslave-4/20/2005
3617lol - doesn't surprise me... although I skipped over it thanks to the now fuNazbuster-4/20/2005
3616I ready your post, and then clicked on "read replies" Guess what...Thyardslave-4/20/2005
3615hmmmm, that could be fun....Janice Shell-4/20/2005
3614maybe even a line of basher wanna bees and suckupers.rrufff-4/20/2005
3613I reading along here, and was thinking more in the line of basher gladiators. Tyardslave-4/20/2005
3612LOL - from the legal observer standpoint, the narrowing came at the worst time, rrufff-4/20/2005
3611Should we think of a website or a thread as a sort of "mortarless lamb hoSmiling Bob-4/20/2005
3610Nope. They're for real. CMKX has become a cult stock. The True Believers Janice Shell-4/20/2005
3609You can't say they are actual longs showing so much enthusiasm. The net is mSmiling Bob-4/20/2005
3608Amr's punctuation may have been off. I may have 3 apologies coming. Tis odd Smiling Bob-4/20/2005
3607Amr's punctuation may have been off. I may have 3 apologies coming. Tis odd Smiling Bob-4/20/2005
3606Like I said bad example, at least as far as I'm concerned. Looks like a scarrufff-4/20/2005
3605A mere 703.5 billion shares, actually.Janice Shell-4/20/2005
3604I think it's equally applicable both ways. I don't follow CMKX. Isn&#rrufff-4/20/2005
3603Yeah, I know, the touts (and suckers) always say: "it's easier to scarJanice Shell-4/20/2005
3602I disagree. In the world of low float microcaps, small changes in volume can affrrufff-4/20/2005
3601Sure it's possible. I just don't think it'd work. I don't beliJanice Shell-4/20/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News