SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Safeguard Scientifics SFE
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4467 83 0 SFE
Emcee:  Mark Sagarin Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3642 Michael, Did you notice what some of the out of favor children did today. CMProbert miller-12/8/1999
3641 Does anyone know the percentage of institutional holdings in SFE ?Numberspro-12/8/1999
3640 SFE has a long way to go, all one has to do is figure out the future value of aOrwell-12/8/1999
3639 Coupla news blurbs re SFE/ICGE: By Tomi Kilgore, CBS MarketWatch still learning-12/8/1999
3638 Knowing when to exit is always the hardest. I really feel for you. Not only diRita-12/8/1999
3637 Actually I won't miss out completely Larry. Don't intend on selling anRob Palmer-12/8/1999
3636 me too I sold at 122. Oh well, at least I got into VISX at 49 1/2.Brian Sullivan-12/8/1999
3635 Hi Rita, I sold the other day at 123. Did you ever see a grown man cry:-)? GlenGlenn M-12/8/1999
3634 Rob, Don't feel too bad. I sold half of my holding at $125! (Sob, sob...) IRita-12/8/1999
3633 The problem i see with trading SFE is that in the 2 weeks, or so, that you are LarryCPA-12/8/1999
3632 Thanks Alan! As you will read in my last post, I sold 25% of my position todayRob Palmer-12/8/1999
3631 SL, I put in a limit order earlier today to sell 25% of my position at 162 and Rob Palmer-12/8/1999
3630 <I>last time it topped out, we retraced over 50% from the high</I> Allan Harris-12/8/1999
3629 SL, Fundamentally, I think the current price, mostly based on ICGEs price is abmichael r potter-12/8/1999
3628 Re ICGE, posted from elsewhere on SI-- This from Individual Investor: Intstill learning-12/8/1999
3627 I figured we had been building a premium back into the stock price over the lasRob Palmer-12/8/1999
3626 At midday I get $144.36. still learning-12/8/1999
3625 One could make the argument that today's advance is justified by the apprecRob Palmer-12/8/1999
3624 I guess the imbalance was simply due to ICGE moving faster that SFE could keep Rob Palmer-12/8/1999
3623 Trading resumed at 162.5. Yes I'm holding. If the split rumors are true (still learning-12/8/1999
3622 Damn Alan, that was quick! Thanks for your input. I don't know...last timRob Palmer-12/8/1999
3621 Trade imbalance shows bid at 160 and ask at 170. Rumors of a split, too. Istill learning-12/8/1999
3620 <I>would appreciate Mike's or Alan Harris' opinion.</I> MyAllan Harris-12/8/1999
3619 Things are all out of whack due to imbalance. The bid was just 159+ and ask 15Rob Palmer-12/8/1999
3618 just a thought..... I'm considering writing some covered calls against somDavid Weis-12/8/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):