SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
MDRX: Allscripts, Inc.
An SI Board Since November 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
716 7 0 MDRX
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
366Connecticut Multispecialty Group Selects Allscripts Electronic Health Record bizJakeStraw-3/9/2006
365I was under impression that the 10 day rule applied only to stocks which traded happyhawaiian-3/8/2006
364Actually, the "Quiet Period" is only 10 days for secondaries. FWIW, Icupiditasradix-3/8/2006
363Stock languishing here. No catalysts. Most analysts silenced by 40-day rule. happyhawaiian-3/8/2006
362Answering own question department: 1) It seems institutional holdings on nasdagprenup-3/8/2006
361Another day another IDX deal. I have to say nothing seems more meaningful at thiprenup-3/7/2006
360Saint Francis Physician Hospital Organization Selects Allscripts biz.yahoo.com TJakeStraw-3/7/2006
359Certainly more than meets the eye about MDRX/GE relationship. Oddities that exisprenup-3/6/2006
358Merger mania continues with ATT/Bell South. I am close to certain we will see ahappyhawaiian-3/5/2006
357MDRX angling to be the "Universal Onramp" From a Jan 2005 PR discussickrunner2001-3/3/2006
3561)Per Se looks like a real good one to me- any insight into potential client basprenup-3/2/2006
355Per-Se Technologies and Allscripts Sign Multi-Year e-Prescribing Services and EHJakeStraw-3/2/2006
354In some ways, MDRX's early support of Medem puts them in a very strong positcupiditasradix-3/1/2006
353Agreed on potential for PI. It seemsvery little attention is being paid relativeprenup-3/1/2006
352I think MDRX can use some of the large amounts of cash it will generate in the nhappyhawaiian-2/28/2006
351I do appreciate your conjecture and absolutely hope you are correct. Perhaps weprenup-2/28/2006
3501) As for how MDs are paid for e-prescription activities, I don't have specicupiditasradix-2/28/2006
349I understand your point that no conflict of interest exists when there is no incprenup-2/28/2006
348stockcharts.com[h,a]daclyiay[pb50!b20!f][vc60][iut!Lc20!Lf]&pref=GJakeStraw-2/28/2006
347We were close to breaking to new 5-year highs. Is it only a matter of time, or happyhawaiian-2/27/2006
346Cupid: Is the analyst quiet period 40 days as with an IPO? I would think we'happyhawaiian-2/27/2006
345Actually, I don't think that there is a conflict of interest. Electronic Prcupiditasradix-2/27/2006
344That's a good point, something I've worried about in the past. I think happyhawaiian-2/27/2006
343HH-Physicians interactive appears to me to be big pharma's way of replacing prenup-2/27/2006
342Re A4: ( Cary, NC – 1/24/2006 ) –– A4 Health Systems®, a leading provider oprenup-2/27/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News