SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
SI Grammar and Spelling Lab
An SI Board Since November 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
4712 68 0
Emcee:  jbe Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3661Lately I've been better at word analysis. :-/Tom Clarke-9/1/2000
3660<i>I could go on, but I am gaga from pain pills the dentist gave me, and tThe Philosopher-8/29/2000
3659<i>Actually, I'm not positive. Just taking a shot at sounding wise.<The Philosopher-8/29/2000
3658<i>It's never proper to use affective. It isn't a word.</i> The Philosopher-8/29/2000
3657Hi Joan! That was great! And the scary part is I actually think I understand igreenspirit-8/29/2000
3656Hi, Mike! Long time, no see. Unfortunately, there is no <i>easy</i>jbe-8/29/2000
3655i know what you mean. i'm a packrat and after 8 years my bookmarks are a bitBiggie Smalls-8/29/2000
3654Suppose I could. But think of all the typing I wouldn't have to do. Know whaTom Clarke-8/29/2000
3653you can't just remember it? ;)Biggie Smalls-8/29/2000
3652Think I'll bookmark that url. :)Tom Clarke-8/29/2000
3651Actually, I'm not positive. Just taking a shot at sounding wise. My intuitioTom Clarke-8/29/2000
3650um... dictionary.com af·fec·tive (-fktv) adj. 1. Psychology. InflueBiggie Smalls-8/29/2000
3649No kidding! Duh...don't I feel silly....:) (escuse the red face)greenspirit-8/28/2000
3648It's never proper to use affective. It isn't a word.Tom Clarke-8/28/2000
3647Joan, oh great wizard of the written word, can we talk..... Effective Affectivgreenspirit-8/28/2000
3646There is an amusing redundancy which has saturated common usage: 'I was thinStan-8/19/2000
3645Christopher, In the King James version of the Bible, the word "whence&quoStan-8/19/2000
3644<i>Maybe this explains some of the confusion.</i> Yes, but I reservThomas M.-8/15/2000
3643Thomas: RE: expecting people to pronounce "compt" the same as "cJack Clarke-8/15/2000
3642Same way I can live with myself expecting people to pronounce ghoti as fish. IfThe Philosopher-8/8/2000
3641Arrgh! All you comptrollers are part of a conspiracy! How did you live with yoThomas M.-8/8/2000
3640There are a lot of ickier words, IMO. Perhaps a good contest here would be to cThe Philosopher-8/8/2000
3639The word "comptroller" really should be eliminated from the English laThomas M.-8/6/2000
3638An update on the project to memorialize Edwarda: Subject 36477Neocon-8/2/2000
3637Another grammar question: From National Review: "It is alleged ... that fThe Philosopher-7/22/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):