SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
NanoTechnology
An SI Board Since November 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
720 168 0
Emcee:  James1000 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
370a creative imaginationdk10438-2/3/2004
369What does USGA have that MFIC does not?Keith Fauci-2/3/2004
368...and nanofluff as we all know, is worth its weight in gold! lolStockJock-e-2/3/2004
367Very funny! ;-))RikRichter-2/3/2004
366I agree with you 100% but it is a sign of what the market will bear for a nanoteRikRichter-2/3/2004
365A better comparison for MFIC would be TASR. <g>BulbaMan-2/3/2004
364USGA is a turd... you are not doing MFIC any service by comparing them to USGA :StockJock-e-2/3/2004
363For MFIC, anything under $4 is a steal IMO. That would place the market cap at RikRichter-2/3/2004
362Is anybody buying MFIC.ob at these levels. finance.yahoo.com What do you thinkKeith Fauci-2/3/2004
361IFX is the symbol and they trade on the NYSE finance.yahoo.comPatricia Meaney-2/3/2004
360Is anyone familiar with this company? reed-electronics.com Where can we pick tKeith Fauci-2/2/2004
359"entertaining" - that's a good way of putting it, unless you tradPatricia Meaney-2/2/2004
358Penny plays are entertaining, we had a lot of fun with USGA on the nanotech stocStockJock-e-2/2/2004
357Some updated nano-particle safety review materialstoday.com Regards, Zetazeta1961-1/31/2004
356Plastic Logic still private. Here is the funding info: vcbuzz.comSam Nizam-1/30/2004
355Do you know for sure that it is publicly traded? The article you sited says thePatricia Meaney-1/30/2004
354........like most nano's you'll find they're private startups,fundedsheetmillgalvanize-1/30/2004
353Does anyone know where this (plastic logic) stock trades? nanoelectronicsplanetKeith Fauci-1/30/2004
352It's a sub penny, and it's a pink - how much more can you ask for? LOL Patricia Meaney-1/30/2004
351hey you asked for a penny stock, not a SUB penny stock, lol.... i saw this a lotdk10438-1/30/2004
350Well just in case it is allowed take a look at this: Cetek Shareholders' RepPatricia Meaney-1/30/2004
349Do you guys include penny nano plays here too, or is that off limits?Patricia Meaney-1/30/2004
348NGEN, Can someone that understands this technology,explain how substantial thismanny t-1/29/2004
347Will it take nanotechnology to make this a reality? wired.com Does anyone knowKeith Fauci-1/28/2004
346My notes from today's interview of MFIC's CEO by Wall SteetReporter.com:RikRichter-1/28/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News