SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
ISSM
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5211 10 0 ISSM
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3711 I've been having little luck with that search engine. but here is the URL fDonald Kirchner-11/10/1996
3710 John: I am well aware of who posted that statement. Brad posted a follow up iCathi Wierzbicki-11/10/1996
3709 Cathi, >Brad: Do you have any verifiable info that Arik Makleff has been arrJohn Boluyt-11/10/1996
3708 RD and others, Are you going to the Munich Fair yourself? If not, I am going Bert Herman-11/10/1996
3707 You said: >I think the wide spread simply indicates light activity. It'Donald Kirchner-11/10/1996
3706 Hello All, Pardon me for butting into your conversation Brad and Darrell, but NightOwl-11/10/1996
3705 Darrell, the person that got into trouble in the FONIX case was not an *IndividBrander-11/10/1996
3704 Brad, In the FONIX case, the negative opinions posted on AOL by one individuaCatfish-11/10/1996
3703 RD, In this forum, opinions are legally fine. No individual investor is goingBrander-11/10/1996
3702 Brad, many statements are supportable...but aren't necessarily accurate orrd greer-11/10/1996
3701 Cathi, In response to "Brad: Do you have any verifiable info that Arik MaBrander-11/10/1996
3700 Brad: Do you have any verifiable info that Arik Makleff has been arrested? IfCathi Wierzbicki-11/10/1996
3699 Bennett: What was interesting to me was that the MMs raised the ask to $1.18 oCathi Wierzbicki-11/10/1996
3698 Darrell, as long as someone posts supportable statments or qualifies his statmeBrander-11/10/1996
3697 John, If they have someone putting in a bid to buy at, let's say, 1 1/8, tBennett Zimmerman-11/10/1996
3696 Craig: There is also the FONIX case regarding negative comments about a compaCatfish-11/9/1996
3695 Craig, Checked it out, it is very interesting reading... SEXI out does TLTK thJohn Boluyt-11/9/1996
3694 John, No, I haven't been following the SEXI scandal but I did just tune inGuinnessGuy-11/9/1996
3693 Anyone out there following the SEXI scandal? Latest update on this is: www3.dbJohn Boluyt-11/9/1996
3692 Cathi, Thanks for your reply. I agree with your explanation. Just find it haJohn Boluyt-11/9/1996
3691 Well, John, this is strictly speculation on my part.... On Monday there was a Cathi Wierzbicki-11/8/1996
3690 Can anyone explain the change in the spread the last couple days? We went fromJohn Boluyt-11/8/1996
3689 I hate to break up the group therapy, but... We have work to do. Does anyone Mitchell E. Bailey-11/8/1996
3688 Apology noted, TB. Recommend you come back after 12/15 November and read the Grd greer-11/7/1996
3687 TB, you said "I felt that over-optimistic posts may lead new investors to Brander-11/7/1996
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News