SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
NANO
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2272 39 0 NANO
Emcee:  Norrin Radd Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
372 Hi Patrick, I found NANO in 95 while it was red hot. It was too late for me to Wade-4/5/1997
371 Wade: How did you find this stock? What made you decide to buy it? Patrickpatrick ertel-4/4/1997
370 Hi Patrick, Excellent analysis. My forecast of the first and the second quarterWade-4/4/1997
369 Gentlemen: Please allow me to share some statistical data which I have compilepatrick ertel-4/4/1997
368 jbn3, This is another confirmation of what most of us think about NANO. Here iPeter Goss-4/4/1997
367 Peter, I too have just put together a 'trend line' estimate for 1997. Christopher Brainard-4/4/1997
366 Any investor that accumulates more than a 5% stake in a public company must filSteve Patterson-4/3/1997
365 All, I'm kind of new at this, so please help. Yesterday, 2 April at 1427 jbn3-4/3/1997
364 Hello all, I have been an investor in NANO for about a year. I think we are rePeter Goss-4/3/1997
363 Ron, I don't understand that either. I placed a limit order at 6 1/8 when jbn3-4/2/1997
362 Wade, The fundamentals for ONPT are improving. Waiting for the 10K to confirm arustyjack-4/1/1997
361 Wade, I believe there were no shares traded on the market today. I had a limitjbn3-4/1/1997
360 Ron, I only use TA to help me understand the price movement of a fundamentally Wade-4/1/1997
359 jbn3, Yes, hang tough on this one. Both Schwab and Zacks nicely summarized wheDouglas V. Fant-4/1/1997
358 Thanx, Doug I'm hanging -- it's beginning to look less like a scaffoldjbn3-4/1/1997
357 jbn3, Volume picked up nicely- three of the last four trades were upticks. WatDouglas V. Fant-4/1/1997
356 Wade, I am holding NANO.It's just that I thought it would be a more active rustyjack-4/1/1997
355 Wade; I agree!!! I like the volume today, and I'll take a closing uptick ipatrick ertel-4/1/1997
354 Ron, My TA indicator showed possibilty of breaking-out today. The volume appearWade-3/31/1997
353 It's only the difference between the bid and ask. 1/2pt spread ouch!rustyjack-3/31/1997
352 Anyone have any idea why the market as a whole falls 150 points and NANO moves jbn3-3/31/1997
351 Ron, There wasn't all that much that was new about this latest release so Byron Angel-3/26/1997
350 Ron, Companies who are cautious release news which may move the price of the sDouglas V. Fant-3/26/1997
349 I know. Hold on because... But this company is not much for PR. News release atrustyjack-3/26/1997
348 Ron, It moved- but the wrong way!! No, in all seriousness, boring or not, hangDouglas V. Fant-3/26/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News