SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Petition To Keep The Real SI Alive
An SI Board Since July 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
724 9 0
Emcee:  Jacques Chitte Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
374 Beta Blocker. Aye for the original. DELT1970-7/31/1999
373 Keep the old please...the "fake" site is awful! Big time Mona-7/31/1999
372 SI alive SI alive SI alive SI alive SI alive SI alive SI alive SI alive SI aliv10K a day-7/31/1999
371 Aye! Signed for "lifetime" on the classic. Thought I was buying a hoJohn Harton-7/31/1999
370 After trying the new version, I found I was looking forward to signing off as Dirtpoor-7/31/1999
369 keep the old SI .... am in agreement with this >>> >>>The Susan Saline-7/31/1999
368 Another very satisfied customer...with the original version of SI. Please keep Brihack-7/31/1999
367 Yes! I liked the old SI as a visitor, and LOVE the old SI as a member. Either wqu168-7/31/1999
366 Sign me up. The new site is too busy and complicated for my liking. mph mph-7/31/1999
365 It has been awful! Keep the old site! Sabre! Sabrejet-7/31/1999
364 Aye Stang Stang-7/31/1999
363 Keep them both for another 3 months at least please dale w ruckle-7/31/1999
362 aye Sonny52-7/31/1999
361 Keep the old SI!!! Carole Magic RN-7/31/1999
360 In some ways, I agree. But for they eye it is very cluttered, imo, and the coljpmac-7/31/1999
359 Keep the Original. Pledge to do so...and keep it going until we collectively saAbuckatatime-7/31/1999
358 Keep the ORIGINAL SI! Carl Dee-7/31/1999
357 If Go2Net wants a new corporate image by revamping its website, they should speIbexx-7/31/1999
356 ORIGINAL Due Diligence-7/31/1999
355 I vote for the original also. The old site is simple and easy to navigate. Thpz-7/31/1999
354 I vote for the original. The new site is a bandwidth hog. IMHO, SI should jusNickSE-7/31/1999
353 AYE Howard H Bouch-7/31/1999
352 Read what it says in the thread header, Susan. <i>Since this is a petitijbe-7/31/1999
351 Hey, I received a post ON THIS THREAD which I responded too. Unless it is off tSusan G-7/31/1999
350 Keep the REAL SI Fuzzy-7/31/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):