SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
ACT NETWORKS
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2326 7 0 ANET
Emcee:  Ellison Ting Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
376 I wonder how low it will go this time?TWC-4/17/1997
375 ANET DOWN 1 3/8 What's up? Are people reading this earnings report as a toShane Miller-4/17/1997
374 Hi John, I don't want to pour salt in an open wound but, the "bottom&Chuck Williams-4/16/1997
373 Great explanation, thanks.stan s.-4/16/1997
372 "In-process R&D charge" is a tax designation associated with buyiYoung D.T. Nguyen-4/16/1997
371 Peter, I find that (R&D) to be of some concern as well. However they do saystan s.-4/16/1997
370 The one negative that I see is the statement: Excluding in-process research chaPeter Martin-4/16/1997
369 <<<THESE ARE THE REAL NUMBERS THAT WE SHOULD CARE ABOUT.>>> EPeter Martin-4/16/1997
368 To all: I'm a trader, and just to give you all some encouraging news I'Nicholas J. Begich III-4/16/1997
367 It's always good to see the basic figures restated, especially when the marKen Ridge-4/16/1997
366 THESE ARE THE REAL NUMBERS THAT WE SHOULD CARE ABOUT. 1) Cash+Cash EquivalentsEd Richmond-4/16/1997
365 Calm down Shane -- the statement is a lot better than you think. WE don't kSoumya De-4/16/1997
364 A penny short of first call, but a penny ahead of Zacks. I don't think it Tom Nealon-4/16/1997
363 I had been nervous waiting for earnings results and the numbers came out today Andrew Q. Viet-4/16/1997
362 One thing for sure. Longterm investors will defintely not be disapointed. As John Lin-4/16/1997
361 I wouldn't get the paddle out of hiding quite yet. No reason to be too excShane Miller-4/16/1997
360 Sorry Sorry Sorry, I read # 349 and posted that message. #350 was not publisheShane Miller-4/16/1997
359 I think last quarters numbers (just released) seemed pretty respectable, considDutchDT-4/16/1997
358 Hey, even if tomorrow gets ugly means more of an opportunity to soak up some shBrett Behm-4/16/1997
357 i don't really know how the market will react tomorrow. If the stock plungAndrew Q. Viet-4/16/1997
356 I agree. I think the Briefing.Com news was little misleading. So not includingManas Pattanaik-4/16/1997
355 It's not bad... you have to read the entire story... "Excluding in-pDutchDT-4/16/1997
354 .17 excluding charges, revenues way up.stan s.-4/16/1997
353 Here is the entire press release. I don't reallly know how the market willAndrew Q. Viet-4/16/1997
352 WOW! -$.11 That's certainly not good! Thought they'd do alot better Shane Miller-4/16/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News