SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Computer Associates
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5232 59 0 CA
Emcee:  Everard Taylor Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3782 DH...... I certainly can't accused of gloating or rubbing salt in any woundBox-By-The-Riviera™-10/21/1999
3781 Hello, I am new to SI so you will have to bear with me. This is my first post aThierry G.-10/21/1999
3780 all right....stop it with the bargain crap. This stock can do almost anything aDEER HUNTER-10/21/1999
3779 J, think of it this way: You are a CIO and you figure you've got everythiEdwarda-10/21/1999
3778 I guess it would pay to read ALL of the preceding posts before posing a questioBox-By-The-Riviera™-10/21/1999
3777 yes.... lemmings.... but can give me an example of how this extends out.... Box-By-The-Riviera™-10/21/1999
3776 It's a lemming thing. After the first few go over the edge the rest just gJohn Solder-10/21/1999
3775 but how does that really work..... how does a slow down (y2k related) in their Box-By-The-Riviera™-10/21/1999
3774 They are spooked by the thought that IBM may see something that they don'tEdwarda-10/21/1999
3773 Edwarda. Re: <i>"I know a couple of CIOs who told me that they were Harry Landsiedel-10/21/1999
3772 Harry, I know a couple of CIOs who told me that they were spooked by the announEdwarda-10/21/1999
3771 Edwarda. Re: <i>"By blaming Y2K, IBM can actually create a Y2K problHarry Landsiedel-10/21/1999
3770 By blaming Y2K, IBM can actually create a Y2K problem for itself and for otherEdwarda-10/21/1999
3769 god a self fullfilling y2k paranoa frenzy..... kinda like an hg wells radio plBox-By-The-Riviera™-10/21/1999
3768 Well, here's something else to weigh: Suppose that the IBM announcement maEdwarda-10/21/1999
3767 yes.. i've been trying to weigh that.... hence my head is completely lopsidBox-By-The-Riviera™-10/21/1999
3766 Keep in mind that CA did not benefit as much as BMCS when IBM's MIPs shipmeEdwarda-10/21/1999
3765 sounds like a buy based on that rationale...many thanks for your input JBox-By-The-Riviera™-10/21/1999
3764 Obviously, the IBM announcement is not good news. On the other hand, CA is notEdwarda-10/21/1999
3763 IBM has now pierced its 200 day moving average....and in direct sync... bmcs anBox-By-The-Riviera™-10/21/1999
3762 you had your chance to buy this stock Joel....in the low 50's...not once buDEER HUNTER-10/20/1999
3761 yikes....so many??? Hope they are not contrarian indicators...ooopss... of cBox-By-The-Riviera™-10/20/1999
3760 three upgrades this morning already..... Computer Assoc. CACE Unterberg TowbiDEER HUNTER-10/20/1999
3759 a 25% increase in individual investors!!!!!!!!!!!! This is one heck of a stockBox-By-The-Riviera™-10/20/1999
3758 Oh, I'm still in the stock so that makes 4 of us....matches the nice 4 poinFrank Drumond-10/20/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):