SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Etec Systems moving up
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1279 13 0 ETEC
Emcee:  Manas Pattanaik Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
379 Jeffrey, My comments on Fiscal Q4: Fiscal Q4 is pretty clear, although I thinkCalculatedRisk-5/28/1997
378 "Backlog consistent with 6 months delivery cycle" could also mean thajeffbas-5/28/1997
377 The backlog comments confused the analysts on the call also. Why are they pleaSkeptic-5/28/1997
376 Regarding Book-to-bill and the backlog: Jeff, do keep in mind the psychology. Carl R.-5/28/1997
375 After hours trading was flat at 40 5/8 or so....... CarlCarl R.-5/28/1997
374 Bill: looks like you hit the magic number of 0.51. The number was good, but I tRaymond-5/28/1997
373 To all: I listened to the conference call too. I think it is an excellent quarken Su-5/28/1997
372 Jeffrey, There are also reasons to be optimistic. I am confused about the backCalculatedRisk-5/28/1997
371 Bill, two comments. My sense is that this is a company having considerable difjeffbas-5/28/1997
370 Jeffrey, I am concerned! First, regarding the conference call: there was no cCalculatedRisk-5/28/1997
369 Thanks for info. Any comment on backlog or book-to-bill, or why earnings did nojeffbas-5/27/1997
368 Hi Jeffrey, Just listened to the conference call. They shipped nine systems, CalculatedRisk-5/27/1997
367 Conference call: 800 633 8284 code 2736382CalculatedRisk-5/27/1997
366 Jeff, Nine systems is 28 percent more than seven. Your expectation of $.65 in Peter Schwartz-5/27/1997
365 Good results except for two things. I expected Street estimates of $.45 to be jeffbas-5/27/1997
364 Greetings everyone! Does anyone have the conference call number? First glanceCalculatedRisk-5/27/1997
363 I agree, and still have a sizable holding, though I did take a small amount offCarl R.-5/24/1997
362 I think if the earnings cooperate this is the beginning of a major breakout. Tjeffbas-5/23/1997
361 While I welcome the price movement, I personally think its unlikely for Etec toEric Jorgenson-5/23/1997
360 Carl, I'd guess it's moving up in anticipation to Tuesday's earningSteve Robinett-5/23/1997
359 Anyone care to speculate about the current move in this stock. It has moved upCarl R.-5/23/1997
358 Warren: <I'm beginning to suspect a conspiracy. Will notify Mulder and Raymond-5/21/1997
357 Raymond: I do not what are you talking about. You maybe burned by ATCT but ETEken Su-5/21/1997
356 More uncanny parallels between ETEC and ATCT: 1) Both begin with vowels AND haWarpfactor-5/21/1997
355 Although I no longer own the stock and am not enthusiastic about it, I disagrejeffbas-5/20/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News