SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Enamelon (ENML) - Does anyone follow this?
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
863 9 0 ENML
Emcee:  Brent Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
38 That site also says: "The U.S. Department of Commerce reports that the ADAlec Epting-3/5/1997
37 Brent, I think what your loking for is the animal study that showed it repairepeter666-3/5/1997
36 Thanks for the additional citing Craig. As for the word repairing I saw, it Brent-3/5/1997
35 Tom, Check out this site from the American Dental Association: ada.org This isCraig Richards-3/5/1997
34 Brent, I read the company's recent press releases and never did they mentioTom Hua-3/5/1997
33 Fred, Fred, Fred. Can you read? How many times did I write that "If whatBrent-3/5/1997
32 if this pig hits 22 iam going to short the ranch. I don't know how many MMtaxikid-3/5/1997
31 Hi Fred - Thanks for a very informative post. The prospectus, dated October 96Kailash-3/5/1997
30 Brent, You've really fallen for the hype. I suggest you read the prospectuFred Puppet-3/4/1997
29 Yes, I wasn't knocking Quigley. My point was that its effectiveness is felAlec Epting-3/4/1997
28 I'm still skeptical. If it repairs cavities, it will cut into the bread-anAlec Epting-3/4/1997
27 Alec, I think you're way off base. IF what the company says is true, FlourBrent-3/4/1997
26 Big difference between Enamelon & Quigley. Quigley is actually producing sHunter Vann-3/4/1997
25 Sell before Friday. Barrons could publish a negative article and wipe out all Alec Epting-3/4/1997
24 I got in at $8 (*_*) but even I don't believe the stock can maintain its moJason Hall-3/4/1997
23 About as much potential as GIFT ;) First of all, I wonder how it compares to flAlec Epting-3/4/1997
22 It may keep going. News today about their patents. HUGE potential here. MelMel Spivak-3/4/1997
21 Howard---- Currently stock is down 7/8. Short position is building. It'snick stalin-3/4/1997
20 Off subject, Howard, I have read some of your posts and respect your opinion. Blue h2o-3/3/1997
19 Both of you are right! The New America column was just a factual account of thHoward Schellenberg-3/3/1997
18 Betty---- This tactic obviously works, as seen in today's impressive jump.nick stalin-3/3/1997
17 Does anyone think this stock is similar to Quigley (QGLY)? Quigley came out wiAlec Epting-3/3/1997
16 Howard, Respectfully, when I calculate PE it is only on this year's and nenoel bustamante-3/3/1997
15 I'd suggest you sell Friday. Barrons has a way of trashing momentum stocksAlec Epting-3/3/1997
14 What is a good price to sell this one. Will it cave in like iom, nscp, caws, .david jung-3/3/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):