SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Nasdaq 100 Analysis
An SI Board Since September 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
238 71 0
Emcee:  Steve Lee Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
38<i> However, the earnings of a company and the expected growth rate of thTimF-12/12/2001
37I think it's not a few companies that have abused it. On the contrary, I thsea_biscuit-12/12/2001
36twfowler, I agree that one should not rely only on PEG ratios to make investmentAlastair McIntosh-12/12/2001
35Alastair: <i>The current forward P/E [S&P 500 Technology] of 43 is apDavid E. Taylor-12/12/2001
34As long as the pro-formas only include one-time items (not recurring one-time itRobert Scott-12/11/2001
33<i>What is amazing to me, however, is that there are many, many companies sea_biscuit-12/11/2001
32<i> But people do buy the fastest and latest, and Intel always make sure tTimF-12/11/2001
31<i> Based on PEG ratio techs are more overvalued now than they were at NASTimF-12/11/2001
30<but more a case of "new PC or stick with the old one".> i have LTK007-12/10/2001
29dude, you know damn well that anything can happen ...quasi-geezer-12/10/2001
28P3/Athlon: Your PC can probably accept either processor, but I would bet seriousSteve Lee-12/10/2001
27<The Athlon continues to outpace the P3 but now we have the P4 with loads of LTK007-12/10/2001
26Yardeni site said S&P 500 was 11% overvalued on Friday, based on 1158.3 closexp-12/9/2001
25See also: yardeni.com The current forward P/E of 43 is approaching the 2000 hiAlastair McIntosh-12/9/2001
24Softechie, I don't have separate figures for the NASDAQ but these charts shoAlastair McIntosh-12/9/2001
23"Is Naz valuation now higher than peak of 2000?" Didn't track NDXSteve Lee-12/5/2001
22Is Naz valuation now higher than peak of 2000? TIA.Softechie-12/4/2001
21Same is true for Mobile Phones - "Barring a record-setting wave of buying iRobert Scott-12/3/2001
201. Competition is indeed a force to lower prices but is this necessarily bad? IRobert Scott-12/3/2001
19I'm going to respond to your response later today but I thought you might beRobert Scott-12/2/2001
18I agree with the points in your post. There is no killer app now. There will be Steve Lee-12/2/2001
17Steve, explain why the masses might need the P4 or 2GHZ+ etc? Lets face the faStoctrash-12/2/2001
16My only disagreement is about revs. I don't see them increasing YoY. The morkrious-12/2/2001
15Yes, their EPS will go up but also their revs might too. As their production proSteve Lee-12/2/2001
14Could Naz drop below 1000?Softechie-12/2/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):