SI Spammer Hall of Fame | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums
SI Spammer Hall of Fame

An SI Board Since February 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
4105	133	0

Emcee: SI Ron (Crazy Music Man)	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
3805	It was almost like reading the script of "VEEP", whose writers seem t	ACAN	-	7/8/2013
3804	It was interesting how many investment threads that term appeared in....	Dale Baker	-	7/8/2013
3803	That "simple search" includes pages without the word you searched for,	Sr K	-	7/8/2013
3802	Then your TOU is kind of a comical veil that the clowns all laugh at every day.	Dale Baker	3	7/8/2013
3801	Depends on how you define egregious - but a simple search for a common term turn	Dale Baker	-	7/8/2013
3800	To my knowledge, politics and coffeeshop boards have never been enforced by SI.	SI Ron (Crazy Music Man)	-	7/8/2013
3799	"We are considering changes, including giving trusted volunteers administra	longnshort	4	7/8/2013
3798	Dear Dale, If we see posts that are particularly egregious, we'll act on th	SI Dmitry (code monkey)	1	7/8/2013
3797	SI badly degrades its brand by tolerating TOU violations in a huge portion of th	Dale Baker	-	7/8/2013
3796	I was referring to the following: e) Using the Service for the transmissio	ChinuSFO	-	7/8/2013
3795	siliconinvestor.com 2. MEMBER CONDUCT Please note that subjects in the "	SI Ron (Crazy Music Man)	2	7/8/2013
3794	Hello Ron: This poster was labelled by me as a spammer after I noticed that he	ChinuSFO	-	7/8/2013
3793	Member 9150890 o~~~ O	Moonray	-	7/8/2013
3792	Member 9150808 o~~~ O	Moonray	-	6/25/2013
3791	Member 9150796 o~~~ O	Moonray	-	6/24/2013
3790	Message 28966760	Sr K	-	6/23/2013
3789	Hi Jeff, I would have to agree with that analysis. not spam.... just not a prop	John Pitera	-	6/21/2013
3788	You have not seen him / her or many others thanks to SI efforts. There is a mini	kidl	3	5/1/2013
3787	I searched these boards for spammers and couldn't find any...	FJB	-	4/30/2013
3786	I'd request that you make DOOD a word in the dictionary. It dates all the w	Augustus Gloop	-	4/30/2013
3785	Hes worse than a spammer, he uses very vulgar language in his aliases and privat	SI Ron (Crazy Music Man)	-	4/30/2013
3784	Dear Deputies, We have us a new spammer. He seems to want to post to Copper Fo	SI Dmitry (code monkey)	-	4/30/2013
3783	I'd consider that more of a FAIL than spam-- a non-existent site with an inv	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	2	4/23/2013
3782	A false lede and a false URL that is missing a period after www. Message 28854	Sr K	-	4/23/2013
3781	SI Deputies, we have a new spammer, the ticker is RFMK. I just roasted an accou	SI Ron (Crazy Music Man)	-	3/24/2013

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):