SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Precious and Base Metal Investing
An SI Board Since October 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
39344 471 0
Emcee:  russwinter Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
38444Seems NG has spoken to interests holding 63% of NG stating they won't tenderryoung8918-11/9/2006
38443I'm in the same boat, but I only need early Jan. Depends on volume. The nItsAllCyclical-11/9/2006
38442I may be premature in saying this, but the way NG is trading (PoG on fire, gold orkrious-11/9/2006
38441I agree that ABX isn't likely going to give up, but they are going to have torkrious-11/8/2006
38440ABX will not abandon the takeover imo. They may well try to ratchet the price philv-11/8/2006
38439One other point from the CC. ABX doesn't own 22% of NG now. They haven'orkrious-11/8/2006
38438Here's what Yahoo shows for NG's institutional ownership finance.yahoo.orkrious-11/8/2006
38437I just sent the following email to my friend. It's self explanatory. <i&orkrious-11/8/2006
38436I caught the last half. But it is archived, as per their news release today. philv-11/8/2006
38435Anybody listen to the NG conference call?zebra4o1-11/8/2006
38434I think the 22% is strictly Arbs who acquired since the HTO started. A lot of thryoung8918-11/8/2006
38433Gold Reserve, Crystallex deny Mibam partnership proposals bnamericas.comdara-11/8/2006
38432NovaGold Shareholders Overwhelmingly Reject Hostile Takeover Bid marketwatch.coorkrious-11/8/2006
38431<i>Can Barrick keep extending this thing indefinitely? </i> I don&#orkrious-11/8/2006
38430Can Barrick keep extending this thing indefinitely? I guess the two week deadlizebra4o1-11/8/2006
38429ABX has acquired 22.5% of NG's shares. I wish NG hadn't dropped their porkrious-11/8/2006
38428<i>I can never get used to the way mining stocks hit a wall once they firmorkrious-11/7/2006
38427Hope there is some kind of significant drop so I can pick up some shares. NG haszebra4o1-11/7/2006
38426ABX's bid for NG expires tonight. Given the way NG is trading (down 17 centorkrious-11/7/2006
38425Amaranth's Loss, Wall Street's Gain businessweek.comdara-11/6/2006
38424<i>Didn't CC say that NG might drop if Barrick dropped its bid? Maybe orkrious-11/5/2006
38423Goldcorp closes contested $8.6B acquisition of Glamis Canadian Press VANCOUVERdara-11/5/2006
38422Didn't CC say that NG might drop if Barrick dropped its bid? Maybe that was zebra4o1-11/5/2006
38421Barrick posts earnings of US$1.09bn in Jan-Sep bnamericas.comdara-11/3/2006
38420Thanks, Russ, for beating the drum on this one when it was $1. Metallica Resourorkrious-10/31/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News