SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
PKGP (Packaging Plus)
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4783 8 0 PKGP
Emcee:  Scott M. Wincklhofer Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3858 Let me get this straight. So what your saying is if someone is being told by tFARcom-6/21/1998
3857 Well if the shorts must cover with OLD shares, then they have to cover BEFORE JTraderGreg-6/21/1998
3856 From What I am understanding it probably is being done legally. I don't knoCoolbreeze-6/20/1998
3855 As I understand it this is how the name change works. At the time of the name cQone0-6/20/1998
3854 Hi TG, You're certainly more versed in these things than I, but if the shorpapa bear-6/20/1998
3853 FP...I did not get the meesage... eom Lakers lakers17-6/20/1998
3852 Good luck Tom, As soon as you win run like hell!LOL Thanks for the responsesFARcom-6/20/1998
3851 I e-mailed that co.this A.M. to clear this up. let's see if they answer. niTomR-6/20/1998
3850 FP...what message are you referring to... Please post the message number you arlakers17-6/20/1998
3849 Thanks for the clarification. Names are so close I can understand the confusioSelfop-6/20/1998
3848 We are invested in Packaging Plus Svcs., Inc. The other is Packaging Plus, IncMarilyn T-6/20/1998
3847 I went to that link and was as surprised as you. I was waiting for some responsSelfop-6/20/1998
3846 Hi Folks, Listen, I just sent whole ream of question to ICC and will post theFARcom-6/20/1998
3845 While what they may be doing is illegal, the rate of prosecution is very small,TraderGreg-6/20/1998
3844 Hi Coolbreeze, My question is not about shorts covering but about illegal shorsedahS-6/20/1998
3843 Message to All RE: short covering I have been trying to contact people at the Coolbreeze-6/20/1998
3842 That is an interesting question. I believe they can cover with the new shares.TraderGreg-6/20/1998
3841 JESTER, your prediction for the stock price to drop this past week to 0.04/0.05anthony karpati-6/20/1998
3840 Rob: If the MMs have 30 days to cover, don't they still have to cover withraven-6/20/1998
3839 Hi Robert, This might be a dumb question but if the shorting is illegal why wosedahS-6/20/1998
3838 Think about This: If this stock was functioning along normal parameters (TheBigSur-6/20/1998
3837 Rob, I hope you're right... The market maker sell and buy, back and forth lakers17-6/20/1998
3836 You guys and gals have seen this right? I'm sure I'm probably being redFARcom-6/20/1998
3835 That's because the volume is not investors buying and selling. Most of theQone0-6/19/1998
3834 Lakers You are right, I cant figure out how this stock can trade so many sharebetty blank-6/19/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):