SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
UNPH _ Uniphase
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1261 20 0 UNPH
Emcee:  Nagaraju R. Arakotaram Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
386 nope!...9rIngotWeTrust-3/5/1997
385 O/49r....Was today the W? ....edEd Frye-3/4/1997
384 I thot I saw something wavin' in yon distance, ed, and it looked whiteish..IngotWeTrust-3/4/1997
383 Hello David, Yeah, yeah, Up is down, down is up, Clinton's a conservativeuri vaughan cummings-3/4/1997
382 Hi Dave....Is Joplin appearing with Hendrix? I missed it the first time around.Ed Frye-3/4/1997
381 O/49r....What's all this talk about breasts? Have I missed something in my Ed Frye-3/4/1997
380 Not only did I not tear up, runnin'z'offygus, I'm the one who calleIngotWeTrust-3/2/1997
379 Cathy, Good decision, come next time this year, your net worth will thank you uri vaughan cummings-3/2/1997
378 As this thread has really served no purpose other than a place where rumors andDavid S.-3/2/1997
377 Sergio, Thank you for explaining "Reg S"! I don't think thicathy-3/2/1997
376 The old saying that if you give a lying fool enough rope he'll hang himselfDavid S.-3/1/1997
375 Thanks, Sergio, hop in anytime! Convertible's and Reg "S" are snIngotWeTrust-3/1/1997
374 Hi, Zeev...this puppy is on an aggressive acquisition trail, as stated by KalkoIngotWeTrust-3/1/1997
373 Ole: You got me puzzled. I do not see why UNPH should do a REG S or any financiZeev Hed-3/1/1997
372 I agree, except cash has gone up since the first of the year - it's probablDavid S.-3/1/1997
371 Your analysis seems right on target. Someone on this thread is making up finanuri vaughan cummings-3/1/1997
370 Cathy Don't let these misinformed idiots frighten you into selling your stStewart V. Nelson-3/1/1997
369 Cathy, I will answer with a posting I have done previously if you donsergio-3/1/1997
368 Owning a few shares of UNPH I've been following the discussions regardincathy-2/28/1997
367 I Totally disagree, and in fact, those in the communications business, are agreIngotWeTrust-2/28/1997
366 I don't think it's the job of executives of public companies to respondDavid S.-2/28/1997
365 Dear David, I am not beneath looking under rocks for OBVIOUS reasons behind theIngotWeTrust-2/28/1997
364 I should clarify (if I wasn't clear before), UNPH has not done, and is not David S.-2/27/1997
363 David S., Ole 49r and Ed Frye. I want to than you all for your unique perspectiJusta Werkenstiff-2/27/1997
362 In case anyone cares, UNPH has not done a Reg S, and has no intention of doing David S.-2/27/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):