SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Fortune Minerals Limited (TSE - FT)
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
612 7 0 FT
Emcee:  Tim Cruise Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
387 Good observation FB. If Fortune has some serious selling pressure, I suspect tDave R. Webb-12/29/1999
386 Hi You All A little research revealed that the normal course issuer bid expiresFarm Boy-12/28/1999
385 I have no idea Mark. The only thing that I am certain of is that there is nothTim Cruise-12/25/1999
384 I would of asked Tiny Tim but he hobbled out of here with a sore TOE. Maybe sommark warburton-12/24/1999
383 I have no idea how the buyback has gone Mark. I have no special or inside infoDave R. Webb-12/24/1999
382 Hey Dave, How is the Fortune normal course issuer bid coming along anyway? I ammark warburton-12/23/1999
381 No problem. In this market, your comments amount to substantial platitudes. MDave R. Webb-12/16/1999
380 Nice answer Dave. Your point , (regarding low sector prices exposing quality jwharryr-12/16/1999
379 You may properly surmise that business in the junior resource sector is somewhaDave R. Webb-12/16/1999
378 How Dave, do you find the time to post on Si , and on so many threads. I would wharryr-12/15/1999
377 Yes I'm president and a director of a public company which has optioned oneDave R. Webb-12/15/1999
376 A question for Dave Webb. Jeff L.-12/14/1999
375 YesDave R. Webb-12/6/1999
374 Dave, You said that you don't have any "inside" information on FTmark warburton-12/6/1999
373 Interesting to me is the speed that all that stock was repurchased (private plawharryr-12/6/1999
372 Perhaps, but had RG sold all his ONT months ago he would have not been acting iDave R. Webb-12/5/1999
371 Oops, GATA is the acronym for Gold Anti Trust Action. lemetropole.com is theRichnorth-12/5/1999
370 I don't know why Ontex shares rose to $0.90 immediately after FT sold them Richnorth-12/5/1999
369 Thats correct as I understand it. RG. and his, continue to hold Ontex I believwharryr-12/5/1999
368 From what I was able to gather, the Ontex shares that R.G. sold were shares thaRichnorth-12/5/1999
367 If it was meant to be a good move for FT, would R.G. not have sold all his Ontewharryr-12/4/1999
366 I don't have any "inside" information on FT, but I can say that tDave R. Webb-12/3/1999
365 David All things said "BIG, Small, HIGH, low." I beleive Fortune entmark warburton-12/3/1999
364 FB I think leaving out the word "large" really changes the comparisoDave R. Webb-12/2/1999
363 Mark, I'm Back An excerpt from Fortune Minerals Third Quarter financial resFarm Boy-12/2/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):