FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks
FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL)

An SI Board Since August 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
41046	34	0	FTEL

Emcee: SI (no user)	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
38721	OK, I've spent enough time on this thread. Now we will wait and see what t	VALUESPEC	-	10/22/1998
38720	>>Pat, that is my whole point. FTEL's expenses being higher than	Pat Garaffa	-	10/22/1998
38719	Pawn how long ago was the passage regarding private placements written? If you	L. Michael	-	10/22/1998
38718	<<We will see if I'm wrong about FTEL's cash-burn rate. The 10Q w	VALUESPEC	-	10/22/1998
38717	<<Expenses will be higher than revenues for quite some time. They are bui	VALUESPEC	-	10/22/1998
38716	<<Everyone KNOWS (but you refuse to think about it) this company is tryin	VALUESPEC	-	10/22/1998
38715	>>Are you saying you think they earned a profit for the quarter ended S	Pat Garaffa	-	10/22/1998
38714	Tom, That post was from a great man who is no longer allowed here. Thanks ag	L. Michael	-	10/22/1998
38713	<<tell us about this mistake, expert!>> Wombat, I would first lik	VALUESPEC	-	10/22/1998
38712	Pawn, Very sloppy diligence. How can you come here and say you dont know. GO F	L. Michael	-	10/22/1998
38711	Interesting..........#3604 on Raging Bull.	TOM MICALE	-	10/22/1998
38710	Another negative spin from you .... << In any event,<b>it is likel	Mitch Aunger	-	10/22/1998
38709	<<Perhaps I wasn't sufficiently clear. Does the language you quoted f	VALUESPEC	-	10/22/1998
38708	<i>Seth, are you saying some of RB's cronies were not kicked out of S	Seth L.	-	10/22/1998
38707	<<I hope you are not insinuating that they are holding back. >> Ar	VALUESPEC	-	10/22/1998
38706	Valeuspec, >and then we'll see why FTEL pre-released revenues but not e	Pat Garaffa	-	10/22/1998
38705	Honesty builds character Val, which would explain why you have no character. Y	L. Michael	-	10/22/1998
38704	Valspec: Thank you for the information on your first post. What I want to kno	Lee Bush	-	10/22/1998
38703	Perhaps I wasn't sufficiently clear. Does the language you quoted from the	Randy Brummitt	-	10/22/1998
38702	tell us about this mistake, expert! Talk : Misc (General) : Cendant Corporatio	wombat	-	10/22/1998
38701	I do not post under any name other than VALUESPEC. In fact, since my first po	VALUESPEC	-	10/22/1998
38700	Randy, this is what Marivn Mansky reported: <<24. How much more dilution	VALUESPEC	-	10/22/1998
38699	<<Is Pam sick too? Didn't she used to post under the same name as her	Mitch Aunger	-	10/22/1998
38698	>>If you can see the "Bull" from your office than you've go	Frank A. Coluccio	-	10/22/1998
38697	Valuespec, does the language you quoted from the recent S-1/A represent some ch	Randy Brummitt	-	10/22/1998

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):