SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
INTEL FOR TECHNICIANS
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1513 9 0 INTC
Emcee:  jmac Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
388 Any body going to short this thing at 140?. It may get it tdoay. The top of tGregory Cole Brock-3/26/1997
387 INTC trading up in the early morning. The bidsize is much greater than the askXpiderman-3/26/1997
386 Many thanks. I think I won't ask you to do any work for me for now. Let&#jmac-3/26/1997
385 jmac, If you draw a line down from the high that contains all movement, breakSteelBlueIce-3/26/1997
384 I looked that up--that was not it. To Anyone: But, back to the question--at wjmac-3/25/1997
383 jmac, if you mean Jerrys' web site see post 147: xstuckey (144 ) FromJohn K-3/25/1997
382 I have posted several times that I wuld like someone to post the site of this cjmac-3/25/1997
381 Hi Greg, You are correct. 1250 is a support/resistance level and of smallerSteelBlueIce-3/25/1997
380 Jerry, Did not understand why you are concerned being uncovered on INTC calls Gregory Cole Brock-3/25/1997
379 Hi X, Agree with your post 100%. I wrote this morning that I felt 131.50 and SteelBlueIce-3/25/1997
378 Hi Jerry, Yesterday's reversal seems to confirm the lower limit of the dowxstuckey-3/25/1997
377 Hi major, I'm confused. I outlined 3 things that I thought had to happen sxstuckey-3/25/1997
376 I imagine the stocks that can will make up moves on light volume - the last lurdppl-3/25/1997
375 Why shouldn't it? Test and probably penetrate - but just a guess. Thomasdppl-3/25/1997
374 Why do you think Intel will test yesterdays low?Christian Atallah-3/25/1997
373 dppl, I agree with your caution despite a very nice day INTC had. The NAZ diSteelBlueIce-3/25/1997
372 Donald, INTC should rally to upper 130s - if it can't then this is bad newsdppl-3/25/1997
371 Neither do I. I was talking about volume on the NAZ - 800 million+ on a down dadppl-3/25/1997
370 Christian, I'm not sure to be honest. At the least INTC should retest yestedppl-3/25/1997
369 I agree with you jmac. I think we had the volume to call today a bonified reverChristian Atallah-3/25/1997
368 21 million shares traded yesterday. Don't you think that is enough to call Christian Atallah-3/25/1997
367 X As you know, I watch for big block trades as an indication of the stocks direMark Jahre-3/24/1997
366 I don't nkow about that. The volume when INTC was in the 126 range was ovejmac-3/24/1997
365 Xstuckey, If you are using a plain linear channel you are correct - its in thedonald sew-3/24/1997
364 Dppl, Remember, my indicators are short-term. The stochastics are showing thadonald sew-3/24/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News