SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
XXXXXXX
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2563 5 0
Emcee:  Joseph G. Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
388 J-- Yeah, well, messy close and all. I have no idea why, and no hints, as forJanice Shell-7/9/1997
387 J, Friday close up 150 points from now. J=Joseph G.-7/9/1997
386 J, Concentrate, concentrate ... Apply your mental powers ... J=Joseph G.-7/9/1997
385 J-- Yeah, I saw it. But if he wants to contribute here, he'll have to calJanice Shell-7/9/1997
384 J, Seems this guy Rubin read my post earlier today ... biz.yahoo.com J=Joseph G.-7/9/1997
383 J, Well, there is always tomorrow ... Find it interesting tough, taht with DowJoseph G.-7/9/1997
382 J-- Well, there you are, you <i>see</i>? When it was down 50 I coJanice Shell-7/9/1997
381 J, You've got to work on it, exert your mental power, <i>command itJoseph G.-7/9/1997
380 J-- Not being very responsive to my commands at the moment, but time will tellJanice Shell-7/9/1997
379 J, Fine with me. If you say so. J=Joseph G.-7/9/1997
378 J-- It is to go up. It is to break 8000 tomorrow. Wait....cloudy....but I begJanice Shell-7/8/1997
377 J, <<Now it obeys ME.>> What is <i>it</i> to do? Give Joseph G.-7/8/1997
376 J-- Well, if taht's true....close at 7962. Broke resistance. So what'Janice Shell-7/8/1997
375 J, Seems a couple of gurus gave four digit numbers in the 7,929 to 7,956 kindJoseph G.-7/8/1997
374 J-- However it may be, the Beast seems to thrive on Js. Let's offer it moJanice Shell-7/8/1997
373 J, Perhaps <i>they</i> feed our Js to the beast of the Market? NoJoseph G.-7/8/1997
372 J-- OH my GOD!! That is dastardly indeed!! But once again, is there a correlJanice Shell-7/8/1997
371 J-- And today?? Pity the bond market pooped out in the last hour, or we mightJanice Shell-7/8/1997
370 J, They've stolen your Js from early posts ... Can get Jill to reinstate eJoseph G.-7/8/1997
369 J^ Just catching up with xxxxxx! <i>Or do you think people will just wakCynic 2005-7/8/1997
368 J-- Well, taht's been the case for a looooonnnggg time now. And actually Janice Shell-7/8/1997
367 J, Seems few largecap techs mask weakness of general list, though. NAZ makes fJoseph G.-7/8/1997
366 J-- Well, it was a short-term <i>something</i>, apparently. Now aJanice Shell-7/8/1997
365 J, That's what it is, a short-term top or bottom. Isn't it? Seems notJoseph G.-7/8/1997
364 J-- Now, now. It might also be considered a short-term top, arrived at in conJanice Shell-7/8/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News