SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Daytrading stocks and futures
An SI Board Since February 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
5884 84 0
Emcee:  Ron Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3884Yes sir. And in light of the Fed's move yesterday, no doubt about coming infRon-3/19/2009
3883<I> Big volatility these next two days.</i> Potential money makers!Ken Adams-3/19/2009
3882I use short term support and resistance lines a lot, go long on breakouts and shRon-3/19/2009
3881Has anyone else noticed the numerous opportunities to trade the ES on nothing moKen Adams-3/19/2009
3880Market showing signs of a turn. If the 5 & 13 stochastics move up above 50 Ron-3/18/2009
3879Yes, I thought it was interesting too. Happy with TradeStation here. I still runRon-3/15/2009
3878Thanks for posting that, Ron. Very helpful info and makes me happy to stay withKen Adams-3/15/2009
3877Barron's annual broker review: online.barrons.comRon-3/14/2009
3876Just experimenting with some charts today. Had some good trades this morning, noRon-3/13/2009
3875That's how I feel about the TF. However, I got skinned on two attempts to lKen Adams-3/11/2009
3874i agree. i have watched them today as i trade the NQ's...the signals are notcharlie mcgeehan-3/11/2009
3873I had a couple of good scalps in the TFs (Russells) today, but the volume is stiRon-3/11/2009
3872In light of today's rally, thought the long view might be helpful. Updated SRon-3/10/2009
3871Not a bad rally here.. lasting over 90 minutes, at least. Holding substantial FARon-3/10/2009
3870Good for you, Ken. I have often found that if I just trade until late morning, tRon-3/9/2009
3869Ron, as I mentioned to Charlie, the error in reading was on my end. I have a haKen Adams-3/9/2009
3868Charlie, it was on this topic. It was a one time commercial. I thought it was Ken Adams-3/9/2009
3867glad you have the nice weather...going to minus 42 here tonight altho i must saycharlie mcgeehan-3/9/2009
3866Oh yeah! I did see that. The guy was spamming all over. SI is pretty quick to zRon-3/9/2009
3865i think it was on here...i looked at who posted it and it only had one post...pecharlie mcgeehan-3/9/2009
3864Hi Charlie.. was it on here? I don't recall any new sites posted. Here'Ron-3/9/2009
3863hi ron i noticed someone posting about a trading site this w/e...now it's ncharlie mcgeehan-3/9/2009
3862Hi Ken I show the ES high between 1030 and 1050am was 691.50, then it dropped faRon-3/9/2009
3861Thanks Charlie. Not what I wanted but I subsequently discovered it was "piKen Adams-3/9/2009
3860686.75 about 10:35 mountain..hope that helps ken cheerscharlie mcgeehan-3/9/2009
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):