SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
Liteglow (LTGL)
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4715 15 0 LTGL
Emcee:  Countryboy Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3890 I figured that is what happened, but it did get me excited for a moment. On a H Peterson-1/3/1999
3889 I would probably also sell when it reached about .08. I need it to hit .09 forDaniel Miller-1/3/1999
3888 Daniel, >>Hypothetical question... If Liteglow did hit .08 after incredH Peterson-1/3/1999
3887 >Hypothetical question... If Liteglow did hit .08 after incredible news on Cjebj-1/3/1999
3886 Subject: LTGL rises to $0.0780 Well, what can one say - E-trade just seems to jebj-1/3/1999
3885 Hypothetical question... If Liteglow did hit .08 after incredible news on CNBCDaniel Miller-1/3/1999
3884 jb, I just looked at my E*Trade account for the first time in a long time and H Peterson-1/3/1999
3883 When they get back from vacation is when I will start getting busy.Daniel Miller-12/31/1998
3882 >Just look at their earnings. - Daniel Well, yeah - let's look at earnsjebj-12/31/1998
3881 This is a reply to Shadow... Oct 21... You asked what happened to me. Well I hDaniel Miller-12/31/1998
3880 Hmmmm... Very possable.... However, if this is all a scam just think how much Daniel Miller-12/30/1998
3879 Take your tax losses already. This stock is one bottomless pit of printed papermaurice18-12/30/1998
3878 Not sure but I think I read somewhere that there is a 6 week period to go from Mr. Jens Tingleff-12/30/1998
3877 It is my theory due to lack of knowledge regards LTGL that they have completedPopiye-12/30/1998
3876 Jens, To my knowledge lgtl did not announce the rs. I had to call Michael K toCAPT.DAN-12/30/1998
3875 The reverse once again - If the reverse is done in order to be able to issue shMr. Jens Tingleff-12/30/1998
3874 I am looking for a list of pro's and con's for LTGL. Can anyone help mDaniel Miller-12/29/1998
3873 >jb, hopefully, something like this **** TEKC now qualifies for NASDAQ smalljebj-12/29/1998
3872 Stock Doc, weren't you the hypster that was going on and on about being surzonkie-12/29/1998
3871 jb, hopefully, something like this **** TEKC now qualifies for NASDAQ small CapDR. MEADE-12/29/1998
3870 >Products selling and in an expanding market without stock exposure is no gojebj-12/29/1998
3869 So what would prevent them from doing the cycle all over again?? Andre Daedone-12/29/1998
3868 Dr.? if ltgl won't buy any shares at .005, why should we? And didn'tM, Anderson-12/29/1998
3867 DR MEAD, that is the exact same thing I said. I am glad someone shares my opinDaniel Miller-12/29/1998
3866 Actually, I look forward to the reverse split. As I reviewed old notes on MRX, DR. MEADE-12/29/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News