SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
AMEV-Applied Molecular Evolution
An SI Board Since January 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
164 16 0 AMEV
Emcee:  rkrw Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
39SAN DIEGO--(BW HealthWire)--Feb. 20, 2002--Applied Molecular Evolution Inc. (AMEnigel bates-2/20/2002
38rkrw, On the theory that Chiron would reward digging more easily than Lilly, I tuck-1/12/2002
37I'd look at the medi collaboration. I think it was a 4 cpd deal. Vitaxin arkrw-1/11/2002
36rkrw, Chances are you know this stuff already, but I did some digging on the &qtuck-1/11/2002
35rkrw, Thanks, maybe I'll do my patent search exercise on something else. Mtuck-1/11/2002
34<i>attractive alternative to the antibody companies at a fraction of the mnigel bates-1/11/2002
33Maxy and amev's approaches are differentiated. Of course amev claims superirkrw-1/11/2002
32rkrw, AMEV has a reasonably comprehensive website. It includes the patent porttuck-1/11/2002
31Some possible competition for AMEV as MAXY signs first antibody deal - Message nigel bates-1/9/2002
30AMEV had a wide ranging and somewhat off day yesterday as other confused investotuck-1/3/2002
29Rick, Thanks much. I looked in Nature and in Nature Cell Biology, but not in Ntuck-1/1/2002
28Again, the model may not be relevant. What's important in the integrin modescaram(o)uche-1/1/2002
27Ah, got it! Well, sorta got it. The individual who did the soundbit probably gscaram(o)uche-1/1/2002
26Yeah, well, it's wait and see. If there is to be a day where indirect attacscaram(o)uche-12/31/2001
25Rick, Deleted (I was calling for your help and you're already here, thanks!tuck-12/31/2001
24I did a couple of Medline searches and couldn't turn up a recent study of rescaram(o)uche-12/31/2001
23Just to kick things off on the search, here's the latest I can find about Vituck-12/31/2001
22rkrw, The audio link below cites an un-named study of knockout mice that suggestuck-12/31/2001
21Nigel, Do we know what drugs LLY has them working on? ijIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-12/19/2001
20Very nice. A few more such deals and I'll get really excited. <g> nignigel bates-12/19/2001
19Nice, deal with Lilly: Message 16809384 Cheers, Tucktuck-12/19/2001
18FWIW (the cash balance?), the quarterly results: >>SAN DIEGO, Nov. 6 /PRNtuck-11/6/2001
17got it, thanks!! Message 16372077scaram(o)uche-10/18/2001
16That's the old Magainin project. I forget, did AMEV optimize the MAb?? Thascaram(o)uche-10/18/2001
15From the MEDI 3rd Qtr statement (FWIW) - "...Finally, we have been making nigel bates-10/18/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):