SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Catalytica Energy Systems, Inc. (CESI)
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1514 20 0 CESI
Emcee:  jay silberman Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
39 Based on your calcs, I come up with different numbers - 1 - Current float is 1rk-2/10/1997
38 Hi Jay - But Van Kemper definitely still has an interest. If you read the newscave dog-2/10/1997
37 I suppose that the company could have other shares outstanding but isn't thMark Healy-2/9/1997
36 Mark I am in the stock but the issue of FULLY DILUTED or potenial # outstandingBill Tomko-2/9/1997
35 I found the following figures on Telescan. The float is the key figure. It seemMark Healy-2/8/1997
34 Okay, so as previously mentioned in this thread, I heard about CTAL this weekenrk-2/8/1997
33 Talk about perfect timing, look at Pioneer Managements recent CTAL purchase (1.JEFF CHAPMAN-2/8/1997
32 Louis, I agree with you about the fundamental story here. This is Glaxo weJeff Briley-2/8/1997
31 Jeff, I've been burned before in those kind of speculative runups. In my cLouis Cornell-2/7/1997
30 I've been in other small stocks that suddenly jump off the map, like ILT, AJEFF CHAPMAN-2/7/1997
29 Jeff, I am one of those momentum players who saw the enormous activity and compLouis Cornell-2/7/1997
28 Remember guys, this stock was between $4 and $5 long before this announcement cJeff Briley-2/7/1997
27 Luois, A point to bring out: I bought CTAL 2 1/2 years ago at $7.50, with analyJEFF CHAPMAN-2/7/1997
26 I generally agree with your reasoning and math. However I think you are undereBill Tomko-2/7/1997
25 "... with a potential revenue to Catalytica estimated at $800 million overqz-2/6/1997
24 What about operating expenses, and revenues they must return to Glaxo, which waBarron Von Hymen-2/6/1997
23 I just checked Van Kasper's web page. They are no longer covering CTAL.jay silberman-2/6/1997
22 Dear Barron, Hard to believe I started this thread. Even harder to believe thjay silberman-2/6/1997
21 Jeff, you mention a quick run to $20. Here's what I figure. If CTAL is a Louis Cornell-2/6/1997
20 I have no interest in CTAL, but I have holdings in Glaxo. The question I want Barron Von Hymen-2/6/1997
19 Jeff, what pullback? This one will gap in the a.m. The train is leaving the sLouis Cornell-2/5/1997
18 Thanks for the post. If we are going to dream, maybe they can do for CTAL what Bill Tomko-2/5/1997
17 Even more news, this is really huge, I may buy more on any pullback.. pcquote.JEFF CHAPMAN-2/5/1997
16 Motley Fool spoke of CTAL today, see below: fool.comJEFF CHAPMAN-2/5/1997
15 Amen. Perhaps they will consider spliting the company into 2 parts. The market Bill Tomko-2/5/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News