SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Ask John Galt...
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
4006 10 0
Emcee:  John Galt Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3906Gregor never had it so good.tlaG nhoJ-1/23/2002
3905WOW is that ever deep. It seems it all turns on sex and shallow broads for pooraverage joe-1/21/2002
3904FYI, here is the private message I received from gregor, the monk, several days tlaG nhoJ-1/20/2002
3903My gratitude, good Father. But it is SI that should be chastised for their conttlaG nhoJ-1/20/2002
3902Here's my response: Message 16935757Father Terrence-1/19/2002
3901John has received his first honorary for his outstanding performance in the folltlaG nhoJ-1/19/2002
3900It seems like old times (and such goodtimes they were too!) LOL FTFather Terrence-1/18/2002
3899Larry T. Sherwood. I like the name. John GalttlaG nhoJ-1/11/2002
3898George, I've got this itch in my pants... The Might OnetlaG nhoJ-1/11/2002
3897I must publish this. JohntlaG nhoJ-1/11/2002
3896Say George- I noticed you couldn't be bothered, when asked, to justify yourLiatris Spicata-10/24/2001
3895Dear Scummy Average-Sized Creep: I have no idea of the personal histories of eiGeorge S. Montgomery110/26/2000
3894Larry, I do wish you would quit using that incredibly offensive word "littlTommaso-10/25/2000
3893George- Nope, don't blush a bit. What makes you think I should? Or perhapLiatris Spicata-10/25/2000
3892Why desecrate a thread that used to sparkle with cosmic gallantry? I don't George S. Montgomery110/25/2000
3891Note To Thread- OT- I regret that this thread is a venue for the continuinLiatris Spicata-10/24/2000
3890Terrence- LOL- You present what you allege to be "facts"- I gather thLiatris Spicata-10/24/2000
3889Another asinine comment from the likes of the pestiferous scumbag Tomasso, who cLiatris Spicata-10/24/2000
3888Well, Larry, it seems you are more programmed than you think. You are not as welFather Terrence-10/24/2000
3887Larry, From confidential sources the identity of which I am prevented from reveTommaso-10/23/2000
3886Terrence- I'll take your statements one at a time: <i><<She isLiatris Spicata-10/23/2000
3885My measured response... She is zany and the New World Order has already infecteFather Terrence-10/22/2000
3884Terrence- So I'll ask again, having failed in two posts from you to get an Liatris Spicata-10/22/2000
3883Sorry... I didn't go back and read the previous posts. I thought you were poFather Terrence-10/20/2000
3882Terrence- You Completely Failed to address the question I asked you. Is that paLiatris Spicata-10/20/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):