SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
Liteglow (LTGL)
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4715 15 0 LTGL
Emcee:  Countryboy Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3915 Ouch a reverse split 60 for 1 ... Effective 1/13/99 Lakers lakers17-1/12/1999
3914 Jens, you seem to be one of the most informative and well spoken. You are very poorboy-1/9/1999
3913 Well, I think that everyone here are decent indeed. There are multiple personalMr. Jens Tingleff-1/8/1999
3912 LTGL...blp blp blp, people move on! there are so many fish in the sea, why sticpoorboy-1/8/1999
3911 I did read that news release the other day about the NASD proposal being approvPhilip Bosco-1/7/1999
3910 ITS ABOUT TIME.... _ Eric I'll second, third and forth that, Eric! Letjebj-1/7/1999
3909 ITS ABOUT TIME.... All of hard working investors will finally be protected froEric G. Erpenbeck-1/7/1999
3908 I believe you're right about more exposure, they will have more shares to dDJ Byrne-1/6/1999
3907 Have to agree with you. For a Million two, the Co's anyones. Just how fTKB-1/6/1999
3906 Captain Dan: It certainly is true that the company does appear to have no cashPhilip Bosco-1/6/1999
3905 Through anticipation, the market already has discounted, and in effect , the cuDR. MEADE-1/6/1999
3904 TKB, One little item to remember is that it takes CASH to put a buyback into aCAPT.DAN-1/6/1999
3903 What is the ratio for the proposed reverse? As always, a reverse has a greater TKB-1/6/1999
3902 >Regarding the CFO. The fact that this is still not a fully reporting and aujebj-1/5/1999
3901 This might be a mute point, but since the reverse hasn't happened yet, can M, Anderson-1/5/1999
3900 I agree - the reverse here seems only to be in order to get further basic fundiMr. Jens Tingleff-1/5/1999
3899 I guess I am just extremely disappointed. The reverse stock split was the lastPhilip Bosco-1/5/1999
3898 Numb to the shocks, but very alert on all signs, is probably the best way to deMr. Jens Tingleff-1/5/1999
3897 I agree Captain Dan as does Jens. I just wonder what surprises await us. I guPhilip Bosco-1/5/1999
3896 I agree. He will get some surprises <eom> Mr. Jens Tingleff-1/5/1999
3895 PB, Did someone make a mistake or are we getting pushed up a little by the MM?CAPT.DAN-1/5/1999
3894 >LTGL has been moving up the past two days... Starting something?... Any newjebj-1/5/1999
3893 LTGL has been moving up the past two days... Starting something?... Any news eDaniel Miller-1/5/1999
3892 There are a lot of things that just do not seem to add up about this company. Philip Bosco-1/3/1999
3891 Wow your giving us such high chances.Daniel Miller-1/3/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):