SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5582 39 0 MTXX
Emcee:  StockDung Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3932The GUMM stock fraud. Still absolutely no reason to cover. The stock will inevBill Wexler-9/9/2001
3931Tuesday September 4, 1:26 pm Eastern Time Press Release SOURCE: Gum Tech Interrli123-9/4/2001
3930I'm curious Danny Boy. Are all these negative numbers in line with your expHank-8/26/2001
3929Well, it wasn't two pages but it was damn close! Ain't life GRAND??Hank-8/11/2001
3928<i>I don't remember reading that they planned to buy in the 8's. IMark Marcellus-8/11/2001
3927Excellent and fair response, Mike. Here is my opinion on the stock buy back thaDanZ-8/11/2001
3926<i>Waiting for short squeezes to be created after stock buyback announcemeMike M-8/11/2001
3925<i>Looks like the short squeeze possibility is increasing</i> WaitiMark Marcellus-8/11/2001
3924"There's no cap on the royalty, so I think this is a big risk to the shHank-8/10/2001
3923"...dolt..." I'm impressed Mikey! I know I've used that termHank-8/10/2001
3922Looks like the short squeeze possibility is increasing. Wonder what news is nexMike M-8/10/2001
39211 Million Share buy-back... DJ Gum Tech Intl/Buyback -2: About 9.2M Shrs OutstaMichaelSkyy-8/10/2001
3920Dan --- regarding the value of their equipment --- $5 million --- my understandirli123-8/9/2001
3919rli, Sorry, I don't spend much time on the Internet any more and just read DanZ-8/8/2001
3918Hank, it is a gentle reminder of the subtle ironies of life that a dolt like youMike M-8/7/2001
3917Yeah sure Mikey, you idiot. That's why the downside in this stock can be meHank-8/7/2001
3916Kevin --- What you're missing is an understanding of the Asset Purchase Arli123-8/7/2001
3915Hank, you have never had any idea...just an uninformed opinion.Mike M-8/7/2001
3914I have no idea. Even if there is a clause that allows GUMM royalties, by the tiHank-8/7/2001
3913Nope, its Michael Kehoe of P&G. No relation to Gary Kehoe, formerly of GUMMMike M-8/7/2001
3912What am I missing here? Why would GUMM be entitled to royalties on products devKevin Podsiadlik-8/7/2001
3911That's all you could come up with?rli123-8/7/2001
3910Here's something I'm not imagining. GUMM is still trading at a price thHank-8/7/2001
3909Hey Hallucinating Hank --- tell us your negative spin on the P&G-Wrigley dearli123-8/7/2001
3908P&G Press Release: biz.yahoo.com (I suspect that they've got the names rli123-8/7/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News