SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
IMON - Quoted from Barron's Corporate Reports
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2220 10 0 IMON
Emcee:  Mr. Rhino Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
395 Says who ? I've owned and followed the stock from 1 7/16 - and the +/- 400%GT-1/17/1999
394 gorcon, I appreciate your concern, but I'm not bad at timing my entries. Mama Bear-1/17/1999
393 << why on earth would you try and short here ? You know as well as I xcr600-1/17/1999
392 The patents are over 18 months old.\ according to US patent links already pubAnthony@Pacific-1/17/1999
391 Well now hold on Bear - the average trade size Fri was 879 shares - hardly the GT-1/17/1999
390 What do you consider old? More than a month? The technology is new and is beinhoffy-1/17/1999
389 The patents are old arent they ..if Im wrong link them.. Anthony@Pacific-1/17/1999
388 The stock will see a "suckers open" created by Market makers and thenAnthony@Pacific-1/17/1999
387 How about the statement that the patents are soo old. That is total BS. This ihoffy-1/17/1999
386 Count, have a great, relaxing evening. I know I'll be sleeping quite soundLouis Cornell-1/17/1999
385 Count, the stock fell into the high teens. I know a genius like yourself never Mama Bear-1/17/1999
384 gorcon, I'm not all that impressed by the volume. It's a low dollar stoMama Bear-1/17/1999
383 Mama Bear...I agree with you 100%. I probably wouldn't be posting here if IEd Swanson-1/17/1999
382Message 6994341 <To: Ron Mgrublian (0 ) From: Anthony@Pacific Monday, Dec CountofMoneyCristo-1/17/1999
381 MomoBear/Anthony - why on earth would you try and short here ? You know as wellGT-1/17/1999
380edgar-online.com This is sweeeeeeet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Anthony@Pacific-1/17/1999
379 Ed, some of us believe that these message boards are not the center of the univMama Bear-1/17/1999
378 Louis, why don't you just admit that you don't have a rational answer tMama Bear-1/17/1999
377 <i>" I refer everyone to the SKYM thread here, posts 100-300. Our goMama Bear-1/17/1999
376 Yes it will as you try to counter the 10 milllion shares of volume all under 8 Anthony@Pacific-1/17/1999
375 MAMA bear says she is not in IMON...I believe her. I have no reason not too. WhEd Swanson-1/17/1999
374 Count, I wouldn't keep playing their antagonistic game - just ignore them, Louis Cornell-1/17/1999
373 You shorts are so full of BS it is amazing. If you were not short IMON, you woCountofMoneyCristo-1/17/1999
372 OK, I dug these up: Message 6994144 <--sell at 29 Message 7027557 <--wiMama Bear-1/17/1999
371 <i>"Why spend the half hour bashing a stock you've already decidMama Bear-1/17/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):