SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Sunglass Hut RAYS- Will it ever breakout?
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
971 6 0 RAYS
Emcee:  Steven Angelil Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
396 Jeff, interesting thought. Could the insiders have been "priming the pumpmarc chatman-8/13/1997
395 Marc you said:>> The insiders who recently bought can't sell for awhiJeffrey L. Henken-8/13/1997
394 Steve, I have a full position, but if it drops to high 7's or low 8's, marc chatman-8/13/1997
393 Hi BayWatcher, Too bad you sold some, but I think our earnings will be at leasSteven Angelil-8/13/1997
392 To All: The latest First Call earnings estimate, which is what the Street lookThe BayWatcher-8/13/1997
391 It's got to be now, Gary. This is supposed to be the big quarter of the yeaJeffrey L. Henken-8/12/1997
390 Thank you Michael, I was just thinking that 30 cents for the Q would be real niGary-8/12/1997
389 Gary, I was just noticing this seeming caution about upcoming earnings. Taken Michael Davis-8/12/1997
388 Zacks is showing $0.30 for QTR 7/97. I am wondering why 8 analysts are on the Michael Davis-8/12/1997
387 To all the Ray-band, I too am long the stock, 1000 @ 6.75, having bought last DGary-8/12/1997
386 Steve you said:>>So, is our support at 8 3/4 washed out now. Or, is it toJeffrey L. Henken-8/12/1997
385 This stock is uncanny how it always closes on a downtick. I bet if someone wenSteven Angelil-8/12/1997
384 I think it is a fairly safe assumption that the quarterly earnings will be goodJeffrey L. Henken-8/12/1997
383 right with you, Steve....FYI, I also have felt PETM may unfortunately turn ouJim Goodman-8/12/1997
382 steve; thanks for the info.after I saw todays upper,I figured today was'mg1041@aol.com-8/12/1997
381 Here we go again with the ma's:-)) I still believe from what Doug. R., of Steven Angelil-8/12/1997
380 ****OFF TOPIC RE: FORE**********************************I appreciate your confiSteven Angelil-8/12/1997
379 Correction on 50 and 100 day moving averages -- I get 50 day simple m.a. of 6 5marc chatman-8/11/1997
378 Steve, I still think that chart has it wrong for the 200 day moving average. Imarc chatman-8/11/1997
377 steve, I dont follow FORE at all,but I trust your opinions.Do you think itmg1041@aol.com-8/11/1997
376 Well, folks, its simply "white knuckle" time with Hut. We still haveSteven Angelil-8/11/1997
375 congrats also on ULBI....may project toward old high 19-22 at some point ? goodJim Goodman-8/11/1997
374 Well at least RAYS is holding well above 8 3/4's for now. That is somethingJeffrey L. Henken-8/11/1997
373 Lots of inflation fear so far in the market today. If the data starting tomorroJeffrey L. Henken-8/11/1997
372 It looks like we bounced off our 200 dma of 8 3/4. This could be good news if Steven Angelil-8/11/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News