SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
stamps.com (STMP)
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1197 23 0 STMP
Emcee:  Beltropolis Boy Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
397 Wouldn't listen to TJ. Shorting this puppy could get you killed! TJ is undeDZOO-8/9/1999
396 Gee Yang you seem pretty sure of yourself. You must know a lot about the postaTradewell-8/9/1999
395 I shorted a lot of STMP -- perhaps too much -- near Friday's close at 34 1/J.Y. Wang-8/9/1999
394 The "middleman" pays 100% of the face value of the postage to the USPRajiv-8/9/1999
393 At the risk of sounding like an idiot, what is stopping the USPS from simply seHiSpeed-8/8/1999
392 A runup of 10 points? We already got 8 1/2 of those on Friday. The news is alrogermci®-8/8/1999
391 <I>Strange how stamps.com is the only company of the four that is simply MikeD-8/8/1999
390 <I>I give you an A for optimism, but I think you just described FridayMikeD-8/8/1999
389 Strange how stamps.com is the only company of the four that is simply mentionedKevin Podsiadlik-8/8/1999
388 <I>My guess is that it will run up first before falling back, as it is thKevin Podsiadlik-8/8/1999
387 That links appears to be incorrect now, here's the correct one: msnbc.com MikeD-8/8/1999
386 <i>Looks like NBC is running the story. STMP is not alone includes PitneyJ.Y. Wang-8/8/1999
385 Looks like NBC is running the story. STMP is not alone includes Pitney BowesTheLineMan-8/8/1999
384 Expected U.S. stamp of approval bolsters Stamps.com news.comMikeD-8/7/1999
383 Another thing to consider is that if there are problems with the implementationcmchang-8/6/1999
382 <I>If us have had problems with "additional hardware" and theirKevin Podsiadlik-8/6/1999
381 <I>If E-Stamp's product is any indication, the "additional hardwMikeD-8/6/1999
380 <I>STMP makes more sense for this, as users don't need to acquire theKevin Podsiadlik-8/6/1999
379 yup, it's good for STMP. The stock tho will fade again. I onlyleft a few sAD-8/6/1999
378 Actually, if you revisit the MarketWatch link I posted earlier, you will see anMikeD-8/6/1999
377 Just like KOOP and many other wanna be internets, these pops are my call to shAD-8/6/1999
376 The most optimistic analyst has a 0.05 per share earning for STMP in year 2001.Bo Le-8/6/1999
375 I'm more wait-and-see then long or short, but that was kind of my reaction MikeD-8/6/1999
374 I got the same ad in the Washington Post. Neat, but i'm going short anywayAD-8/6/1999
373 as a small trading fund, we rely upon technical analysis primarily. this technihedge fund-8/6/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News