SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
IFLY - travel sales on the web pure play
An SI Board Since January 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4761 16 0 IFLY
Emcee:  Peter R Smith Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3986 Tony,your being whimsical I am sure---BTW,I have now seen 4 blocks of 15k shareLTK007-1/21/1999
3985 IFLY coming into buying range... T-Lo Greens-1/21/1999
3984 Phil, You deserved to get bashed because of your intentionally misleading remaIFLYer-1/21/1999
3983 Tremblin' Hubric, your logic that you used to bash this stock and call it aIFLYer-1/20/1999
3982 ASs I have not given just my opinion, I have given links that PROVE my points aSir Auric Goldfinger-1/20/1999
3981 Thoughts From a Bystander Sorry to disappoint you, Sergio, but I call it like Razorbak-1/20/1999
3980 Auric, while you are busy giving advice...perhaps you can post the results of ySergio H-1/20/1999
3979 Razor, I know that you enjoy a good show as much as anyone, but your post was iSergio H-1/20/1999
3978 Fact of the matter is that people are blindly throwing money at very questionabSir Auric Goldfinger-1/20/1999
3977 blankmind I got a second haha from HiLO/IFLYer ---he is low life--he gets no sLTK007-1/20/1999
3976 Auric - c'mon, show some class. You won this round. Lot of well-intentioneblankmind-1/20/1999
3975 Your very existence as a one thread wonder is disgusting, even worse in a proveSir Auric Goldfinger-1/20/1999
3974 Don't Apologize Phil: Your comments were actually quite perceptive and raRazorbak-1/20/1999
3973 I would like to thank each person who responded to my previous post. A nuPHG-1/19/1999
3972 Davis, simarx and IFLYer ,you all do yeoman like jobs of defending Ilee west-1/19/1999
3971 Good posts SIMARX and IFLYer.... I didn't even know how to respond to someM.R. Davis-1/19/1999
3970 BRAVO! IFLYer (eom)lee west-1/19/1999
3969 The company plan was laid out back in April in the CBSMarketWatch and The StreeIFLYer-1/19/1999
3968 Here is another rebuttal to your idiotic post from the Yahoo board: messages.yIFLYer-1/19/1999
3967 I find very disgusting the ex-longs who change their tune after they sold. TheIFLYer-1/19/1999
3966 Standard risks that are required in any filing. Have you read PTVL's? 1. simarx-1/18/1999
3965 Simarx, I can't see anything even close to $40 this year, maybe nePHG-1/18/1999
3964 another nice post from the Yahoo Board: Crorier... exactly right by: amg00 Alex MG-1/18/1999
3963 also nice post from the Yahoo Board: by: Crorier (M/Stone Mountain, GA) Alex MG-1/18/1999
3962 Let's not forget that the "Internet Phone" is happening now. GivJohn Martin-1/18/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):