SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
SATH - Shop At Home
An SI Board Since September 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1329 8 0 SATH
Emcee:  christopher Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
404 When you think of all the people that wanted to get a fill in the last HUGE 10 christopher-2/5/1999
403 Sharon, You're an attorney and your definition of REDACT is to publish? ITarheel-2/5/1999
402 I saw another good post on Yahoo...nice to see you back Mr Miller... Congratschristopher-2/5/1999
401 One of the few useful things from the yahoo sandbox. The poster says it was inMr. Miller-2/5/1999
400 Over 600K shares traded in the last 10 minutes of SATH, it gained an extra dollchristopher-2/5/1999
399 Jay, Was that last sentence a question? I'm in North Carolina and you'Tarheel-2/5/1999
398 Posters, if you go to post # 299 you'll see that people are asking you to schristopher-2/5/1999
397 Thanks buddy and as far as the use of the word it is correct... Anthony@Pacific-2/5/1999
396 Correcomundo ! Redact is a specialized form of "retract" If you'Jay Fisk-2/5/1999
395 Now where were we...ah yes...ya know from the looks of things we had over 600K christopher-2/5/1999
394 Anthony, I believe that is the correct use of that word. I'm glad I'mTarheel-2/5/1999
393 I was saying exactly that... Anthony@Pacific-2/5/1999
392 Serpentine, Anthony,.... Serpentine . Next in line? wcap/pwccScott Carr-2/5/1999
391 Excuse me, hate to but in, but I was under the impression that REDACT means toTarheel-2/5/1999
390 OK, acknowledged, do not post to me publicly or privately per terms of use. YDavid C-2/5/1999
389 David and chris..we can talk amongst ourselves. Sharon L.-2/5/1999
388 No I never did...ever!!! could care less about his SS#..just wanted to know if Anthony@Pacific-2/5/1999
387 So your first BIG short tranche of 5000 is now in the minus column?..oh dear..Islander-2/5/1999
386 Do not post to me publicly or privately per terms of use Anthony@Pacific-2/5/1999
385 Anthony, I know Christopher, he is not a paid spammer!!! I work with him. He isDavid C-2/5/1999
384 anthony...so you never asked him to write out his social security number? HmmmSharon L.-2/5/1999
383 Withhold ..what ever you want ..to call it he wasnt beiung asked for it Anthony@Pacific-2/5/1999
382 A@P...YES!!!! I've been away from my computer and just saw your coverage. robbie-2/5/1999
381 anthony anthony anthony...read your law books..dictonary..thesaurus...but do Sharon L.-2/5/1999
380 He has not denied compensation directly or indirectly..and I will issue no retrAnthony@Pacific-2/5/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News