SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T)
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4504 44 0 MAN
Emcee:  Mark Bartlett Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4054 For good reasons I think. Mark, the mining sector is depressed. But it wonClaude Cormier-3/11/2000
4053 Claude, I see that MAN is rated as a strong buy, by CIBC in their latest reporMark Bartlett-3/11/2000
4052 ray: I hope you are right. been a long wait. Live long and prosper, littlejLittle Joe-3/10/2000
4051 Hi Little Joe... Called the company late this afternoon...Mike Mallard stated Sailfish-3/10/2000
4050 Claude: "We should have news very shortly that will help this thread to gLittle Joe-3/8/2000
4049 <<MAN is on the move today. CC must be buying again!>> Well not reClaude Cormier-3/8/2000
4048 <<I still shudder at how easy it is to be taken in>> Yea, but onlyTheBusDriver-3/8/2000
4047 from the price action today I would say you are right...news very soon? wayneTheBusDriver-3/8/2000
4046 <i>Hey! I supported IPM and look were it got me. Sorry, Touchy subject.&lGerald Walls-3/8/2000
4045 Hi Mark I know you were not directing these comments at me directly. I guess iTheBusDriver-3/8/2000
4044Mark Bartlett-3/8/2000
4043 We should have news very shortly that will help this thread to get back on the Claude Cormier-3/8/2000
4042 Wayne, <<So now can we move on? I for one would like to put this behind Mark Bartlett-3/8/2000
4041 Of-course both you and OH are right in your assesment of IPM and what went on. TheBusDriver-3/8/2000
4040 Hey! I supported IPM and look were it got me. Sorry, Touchy subject. wayneTheBusDriver-3/8/2000
4039 <i>What the hell, I read through the four last posts and not one mention Gerald Walls-3/8/2000
4038 What the hell, I read through the four last posts and not one mention of MAN! Wgordon-3/8/2000
4037 <<Mr. Toxic Personality surfaces! Still angry that you didn't sufficiClaude Cormier-3/7/2000
4036 O.H., << those failing to meet that test were attacked, denigrated, ostrMark Bartlett-3/7/2000
4035 Mark, As you may recall, total loyalty to IPM was required -- those failing toO. H. Rundell-3/7/2000
4034 O.H., Hard to believe that someone could hold a grudge that long .... like anyMark Bartlett-3/7/2000
4033 Mr. Toxic Personality surfaces! Still angry that you didn't sufficiently suO. H. Rundell-3/7/2000
4032 Jeff, I think MAN has held up very well. I mean, look at price of gold - $256.Joe Hartenbower-3/5/2000
4031 Bruce, Zinc prices aren't helping them much either.Jeff Dickson-3/1/2000
4030 I think the fact that copper inventories are sky high and that the copper priceBruce Robbins-2/29/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News