SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Petrokazakhstan Inc.
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2357 10 0 PKN
Emcee:  kingfisher Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
407 MURFI, Thanks for the great link. That certainly makes it clear that protectionteevee-11/9/1999
406 Foxyloxy, That is not what I asked. I know you can "read" better thanteevee-11/9/1999
405 MURFI Thanks. Great digging. FoxyLoxyFoxyLoxy-11/9/1999
404 teevee I think it too early to have an agreement between the parties (because FoxyLoxy-11/9/1999
403 Hickory You are taking all the fun out of this. I do not speak for everyone, bFoxyLoxy-11/9/1999
402 Bugsy I believe your logic is flawed here. Just because the Company is no longFoxyLoxy-11/9/1999
401 Hickory I generally agree with your post, certainly with respect to doing busiFoxyLoxy-11/9/1999
400 I came across a very good article reviewing the Companies' Creditors ArrangMURFI-11/9/1999
399 Razor and Foxyloxy, It is apparent that there was no agreement between the partteevee-11/9/1999
398 Back to court tomorrow, I think; then a news release after court .. Alberta tRon Schier-11/9/1999
397 with the low volume, it seems like it must be pretty tight lipped where the actcooliemon-11/9/1999
396 To all, It looks like the company/(monitor ?) is going back court to amend /reRon Schier-11/9/1999
395 suppose anyone has blinked yet?cooliemon-11/9/1999
394 Teevee- just catching up on some posts and must say that I am in awe of your paMURFI-11/8/1999
393 The Real Players Hickory, Thank you for finally explaining what you meant by Razorbak-11/8/1999
392 Razorbak, Yes, I too got sucked into responding to what seemed to me to be verHickory-11/8/1999
391 hurricane is no longer trading on the nadaq which means they are not under the bugssy-11/8/1999
390 I've got to believe, judging from the credentials of the former chairman ofcooliemon-11/8/1999
389 About Face? Hickory: Just for purposes of clarification, a couple of days agoRazorbak-11/8/1999
388 All, Thanks to all the posters for their posts which have enlightened me regarHickory-11/8/1999
387 Razor, I agree, but judges up here are not elected .. some differences .. I alsRon Schier-11/8/1999
386 Omnipotent Judges? Ron: There is a significant difference between: (1) a judgeRazorbak-11/8/1999
385 MURFI, <I>And I suspect that they would have approved the acquisition inteevee-11/8/1999
384 What's next. Any judges or lawyers out there ?? Need approval of creditorRon Schier-11/8/1999
383 NOVEMBER 5, 1999 Court Dismisses Final Objections to Philip Services' CCAARon Schier-11/8/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):