SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Conseco Insurance (CNO)
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4155 38 0 CNO
Emcee:  DAVID BROWN Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4080Bonds pricing: B3 CCC 100 Conseco Fi 10.250 06-01-2002 26.562 NC 91.375 Softechie-10/20/2001
4079Before you buy, make sure you know where the bonds are trading. This looks much Sr K-10/20/2001
4078Softie - So would you go long at $2? - AllenCogito-10/19/2001
4077It banged on that $4.50 this AM. I think it will drop to $2. Still watching it aSoftechie-10/19/2001
4076Wendt has a real battle on his hands now. My friend Jacobs just screwed his credSoftechie-10/19/2001
4075Well are you warming up to do battle on this one at $2? It broke 5? Wasn't tBWAC-10/19/2001
4074Closed at $5 and at critical level. If it can't hold $5 and it's likely Softechie-10/19/2001
4073Softie, Gary - This current drop does seem a bit overdone already, don't yoCogito-10/18/2001
4072will rejoin the action myself @ that point!Gary Gwynn-10/18/2001
4071If it can't hold $4 then $1.50 it goes. I'll be waiting there.Softechie-10/18/2001
4070Eavis da Reamus, reams'us agin...http://www.thestreet.com/markets/detox/1000Gary Gwynn-10/3/2001
4069The memo No.16 sounds like warning. Conseco Issues Memo No. 16 INDIANAPOLIS, Indzyx1996-10/2/2001
4068I BEG ALL TO READ. IT’S FOR YOUR GOOD AND AMERICA’S. I believe there are very indexit-10/1/2001
4067Man, if only you guys could devote as much energy to looking into the substance Kevin Podsiadlik-9/26/2001
4066I think TSC's policy is a gimmick. those staff writers may not have the posizyx1996-9/25/2001
4065>>"he could get cash compensation from shorts when he write an articlCogito-9/12/2001
4064TSC's policy is only for staff writers. Doesn't apply to Cramer. He has Jagfan-9/11/2001
4063In correction, what I said in last discussion: "he must get cash compensatizyx1996-9/10/2001
4062First of all, I am not sure the TSC's policy is true since Crammer has wrotezyx1996-9/10/2001
4061Jim Cramer dancing the tango in his underwear is a scary thoughtJagfan-9/8/2001
4060>>Statement at bottom of article: In keeping with TSC's editorial poliCogito-9/8/2001
4059Statement at bottom of article: In keeping with TSC's editorial policy, PeteJagfan-9/7/2001
4058Eavis has talked about same staff over and over again. I think his attitude is czyx1996-9/7/2001
4057Headlining todays TSC, Eavis the Peevis reams'us: thestreet.comGary Gwynn-9/7/2001
4056Boy oh boy. My man Jabobs really made a mess on AREM. This Conseco is getting mySoftechie-9/4/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):