REDB! Is Anyone Following This Stock? | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
REDB! Is Anyone Following This Stock?

An SI Board Since May 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
241	1	0	REDB

Emcee: David Peterson	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
41	Any new opinions on this company. I'm thinking about buying a few shares, b	Bald Eagle	-	10/2/1996
40	Paine Webber initiated coverage of REDB with a "buy." See: techstock	Mike 2.0	-	9/13/1996
39	What's up with REDB today? Up 25% . . . WSJ Briefing Book is crashing my N	Jim Privat	-	9/13/1996
38	I don't know. Estimates for '97 are .28, so it's still a rich valu	Bill Harmond	-	8/20/1996
37	Any idea why it's so thinly traded? Clearly an interesting idea, and they&	developer	-	8/20/1996
36	Last quarter's earnings were above consensus. I'm keeping mine.	Bill Harmond	-	8/20/1996
35	William, I think from today GNSMers are allowed to sell their stock. Seems sta	developer	-	8/20/1996
34	Anyone still following REDB??? Income was down due to $500,000 fee for license	jeff w day	-	7/27/1996
33	Consensus was 4 cents. REDB beat the estimate by 1 cent (25%). A year ago the q	John Milnor	-	7/16/1996
32	Hi Jay, Any idea what the consensus estimate was. Redb posted 5cents eps (bef	Anish Grewal	-	7/16/1996
31	The insiders at REDB are still within the silent period. They are not allowed	Serendipity	-	7/15/1996
30	Jeff, Let me add to your list above. I think you have some valid points. With t	Keith Howells	-	7/14/1996
29	Dave, I think Red Brick is going to continue falling. A few reasons: 1) Oracl	Jeff Stagno	-	7/8/1996
28	Gensym's process engineering software seems like paradigm-shifting stuff to	Bill Harmond	-	7/8/1996
27	William, Thanks for the quick response. When you say GNSM is a great company w	developer	-	7/7/1996
26	Gensym is a great company. At a P/E of 54, it's not wildly overpriced comp	Bill Harmond	-	7/7/1996
25	William (or do you prefer Bill?), This is a bit off-topic but I noticed you co	developer	-	7/7/1996
24	Paul, I think Prizm will be ok after a while. The tech sector is very dangerou	Bill Harmond	-	7/2/1996
23	As of 1pm est PRZM's tanked to 11 and rebounded to 14 1/2. Geez, talk abou	developer	-	7/2/1996
22	Paul, I'm holding out. I think they have some more on the downside or at l	Bill Harmond	-	7/2/1996
21	Now that PRZM has retreated to 18+, do you feel any differently? I understand t	developer	-	7/1/1996
20	Paul, I'm not clear on Informix's under-performance. It's a well-r	Bill Harmond	-	6/25/1996
19	I have been a lurker for some time here, and have appreciated your comments thr	developer	-	6/24/1996
18	Don, Who knows? The way I see it, REDB is the right company in the right busin	Bill Harmond	-	6/24/1996
17	My Zack report on REDB has '97 estimates at .28, .29. and .30 with projecte	Don Johnson	-	6/24/1996

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):