SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
42835 221 0
Emcee:  wooden ships Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
41010Queen, do you feel guilty about something? Did the grandkids run you ragged? Youyaetmo-11/30/2008
41009All I saw was the headline - something about posting a message # 5XXX as I recalEQ 111/30/2008
41008No, I didn't see it. What did it say?octavian111/30/2008
41007Octavian, Did you happen to see a post by Seacruiser (after your 41006) and nowEQ 111/30/2008
41006Yaetmo, just for the record, are you REALLY trying to say that kirk cut-and-pastoctavian511/30/2008
41005MI said to kirk: <<But in any case, I hope it makes you feel better havinoctavian511/30/2008
41004<i>I'm</i> the ostrich, yaetmo? lol. *I* wasn't the one implqueenleah411/30/2008
41003Well queen, it's a free country, so you can think however you like, irrespecyaetmo111/30/2008
41002After looking at the 2002/2003 charts a little more, I think he'll stay withInvestor2211/30/2008
41001They're not irritating me--they're just a bit underpowered in that deparqueenleah211/30/2008
41000Indeed! If they are irritating you, the best way to get some peace and quiet isEQ 211/30/2008
40999I was just thinking the same thing, EQ, that it is so <u>curious</u>queenleah311/30/2008
40998Whatever your intention, yaetmo, the innuendo was that it may somehow have happequeenleah411/30/2008
40997MWI, Dave is very sensitive about letting out anything even remotely personablyyaetmo-11/30/2008
40996<i>Queen. Why would kirk lie about something which is so simple for anyonequeenleah411/30/2008
40995queenleah, A suggestion if I may. Perhaps you should question kirk and/or honeEQ 311/30/2008
40994My point was to correct what appeared to be a misconception on your part. There yaetmo-11/30/2008
40993Queen. Why would kirk lie about something which is so simple for anyone to veriMidwest_Investor511/30/2008
40992kirk said of Octavian: <i>I'd say you were very high on the list of wMidwest_Investor611/30/2008
40991Kirk said: <i> what a moron you are.</i> I hope you feel better nowMidwest_Investor611/30/2008
40990yaetmo, there was no point to your original post except to cast doubt that the mqueenleah311/30/2008
40989Queen, that is not what I said, so quit making stuff up. "Oh baloney, yaetyaetmo-11/30/2008
40988Kirk said: <i>Looks like Dave verified what I said about Queen/butterloverqueenleah411/30/2008
40987>>>Looks like Dave verified what I said about Queen/butterlover, groaneMidwest_Investor611/30/2008
40986Looks like Dave verified what I said about Queen/butterlover, groaner/shres and Kirk ©-11/30/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News