GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical
GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold

An SI Board Since January 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
5582	39	0	MTXX

Emcee: StockDung	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
4107	<i>Your method of valuing firms is bogus. Funny, I've never seen your	Mad2	-	3/13/2002
4106	Dan the quote I was referring to was: <i>"Increase the presence of t	Mark Marcellus	-	3/13/2002
4105	<Dan's dark hints that the company might soon return to selling its only	DanZ	-	3/12/2002
4104	I'm still lurking Mad. There's just nothing interesting to say. Legiti	Hank	-	3/12/2002
4103	You could be right about that mad2. Kinda reminds you of those McDonald boys.	Mike M	-	3/12/2002
4102	Of course they were, and hats off to them. Its what makes America great (except	Mad2	-	3/12/2002
4101	<i>Hmmmmmm this whole Zicam thing was of their making and they'd rathe	Mike M	-	3/11/2002
4100	Oh Mike, if you quote, please be accurate <i>Doesn't mean he has to bu	Mad2	-	3/11/2002
4099	Mark, I'll grant you a couple brand names were mentioned....but,"fairly	Mike M	-	3/11/2002
4098	<i>Mark, I didn't notice any brand or firm mentioned anywhere. Why sho	Mark Marcellus	-	3/11/2002
4097	Yeah mad...Not many of us paragons of virtue left.	Mike M	-	3/11/2002
4096	Thanks Mike. Its unfortunate that Dan is so narrow minded:?) mad2	Mad2	-	3/11/2002
4095	Nice to have an open minded fellow such as yourself to keep everyone in line mad	Mike M	-	3/11/2002
4094	Mark, I didn't notice any brand or firm mentioned anywhere. Why should Zicam	Mike M	-	3/11/2002
4093	Its the oracle of GUMM, wronge way Danny Boy. I see you haven't changed much	Mad2	-	3/11/2002
4092	Dan, I had decided to leave this dead horse alone, but as long as you're her	Mark Marcellus	-	3/11/2002
4091	One more thing about your bogus calculation: <Realistically its worth 24-32	DanZ	-	3/11/2002
4090	Your method of valuing firms is bogus. Funny, I've never seen your calculat	DanZ	-	3/10/2002
4089	Kinda quite here. Noone even bothered to comment on earning release. Guess the l	Mad2	-	3/10/2002
4088	Yes, Hank we do agree. I have owned PFE for 32 years now. The annual dividend	Mike M	-	12/22/2001
4087	"I still think PFE will and I have a lot more shares of that." Well M	Hank	-	12/22/2001
4086	Thanks Hanky, if I need any help I'll let you know. Regarding the bet, yo	Mike M	-	12/21/2001
4085	Mikey, Do you need help making back some of your massive loss in 2002? I'l	Hank	-	12/21/2001
4084	No stupid, this one needs FDA approval. You probably should a had a V-8.	Mike M	-	12/20/2001
4083	Even better! They could have just SAID they conducted a legitimate clinical tri	Hank	-	12/20/2001

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):