SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Fortune Minerals Limited (TSE - FT)
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
612 7 0 FT
Emcee:  Tim Cruise Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
412 Dave. This is more typing than I have done in a year, plus a few long distance Farm Boy-1/16/2000
411 Very sorry to hear that Farm Boy. I have heard that people around here have lorobbwharry-1/16/2000
410 FB, I understand things better now. You're right, I had missed the point. Dave R. Webb-1/16/2000
409 Dave. Chores were light today so I got up from the barn early. It seems to me Farm Boy-1/16/2000
408 Good idea Jeff. But just to set the record straight, my posts are my posts. IDave R. Webb-1/16/2000
407 You wrote, amongst other things, "If you are talking about all the activRichnorth-1/16/2000
406 Perhaps I can assist in giving this discussion some direction. Those investigJeff L.-1/16/2000
405 I'm not sure I understand what you are trying to say FB. You say that sincDave R. Webb-1/15/2000
404 Tim. You should try to get ahold of Fortune Minerals annual reports from 1992 uFarm Boy-1/15/2000
403 Mark, You have certainly done some work and spend a lot of time on these issueTim Cruise-1/14/2000
402 Dave, I have taken your numbers and reviewed them against the insiders report Imark warburton-1/13/2000
401 If commodities do rise I whole heartedly agree it is best for everyone in the rmark warburton-1/11/2000
400 As you recommended, I have subscribed to Canada-Stockwatch and checked on the tRichnorth-1/10/2000
399 Mark I thought I'd check on some points you raised. You are right about dDave R. Webb-1/10/2000
398 Mark, Thank you for you message. I will look into your recommendations. I ceaRichnorth-1/8/2000
397 You've raised some good points. I think we all appreciate thoughts and vieDave R. Webb-1/7/2000
396 Richnorth, These "tire kickers" and "pretenders" you mentiomark warburton-1/7/2000
395 You have been so prescient about the direction of Fortune's stock that I amRichnorth-1/7/2000
394 FB, wow. Some action there. I noticed it was IPO Capital selling very hard thDave R. Webb-1/6/2000
393 It's time to get back on track. That big thud was Fortune hitting a new recFarm Boy-1/6/2000
392 OFF TOPIC??? Attention!!! There's a new <i>gold-rush</i>:- DRichnorth-1/6/2000
391 Mark You may be correct on all counts. Perhaps the reconciliation of OntexDave R. Webb-12/31/1999
390 Your arguments lack a little substance. 1) If NICO is worth something to any onmark warburton-12/31/1999
389 Don't misunderstand me. I have no problem with ONT. I think that they havDave R. Webb-12/30/1999
388 I think a coordinated selling of Ontex shares will be an excellent eye-opener fRichnorth-12/29/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):