SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
The Left Wing Porch
An SI Board Since December 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
6089 46 0
Emcee:  Poet Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromPosted
4164nytimes.comMac Con Ulaidh2/24/2001
4163Can anyone find fault with this logic? I sure as heck can't.cosmicforce2/23/2001
4162The more I read it the more I pick up on some of the subtleties, and I like themYlangYlangBreeze2/23/2001
4161The latest alert from F.A.I.R ================ New York Times on Iraq AirstrikesMighty_Mezz2/23/2001
4160I like that - a secular St. Francis! <eom>cosmicforce2/23/2001
4159I knew you would, Hon. :) Every time I picture you, I think of little creaturePoet2/23/2001
4158It is ultimately a very reasonable treatise and it is consistent both within andcosmicforce2/23/2001
4157YYB, It took me a couple of reads to understand where the author was coming froPoet2/23/2001
4156Respect for Life - Prochoice - Anti Abortion AYlangYlangBreeze2/23/2001
4155Reagan-Bushx2 Supreme Court Reverses Civil War: Confederacy Wins! <b>Justopalapril2/22/2001
4154<b>I hope the Democrats show more guts than they did with Ashcroft. I goMephisto2/21/2001
4153I appreciate the clarification. No need to apologize.Constant Reader2/20/2001
4152<i>If you have an opinion sympathetic to Clinton's pardon of Rich, pleThe Philosopher2/20/2001
4151Election Case a Test and a Trauma for Supreme Court Justices nytimes.coWin Smith2/20/2001
4150Apparently we both misinterpreted someone's remarks. My apologies for misinMac Con Ulaidh2/19/2001
4149You are certainly entitled to your unique interpretation of my remarks, which weConstant Reader2/19/2001
4148CR ~ I got nothing about any number of wrongs making a <i>right</i> Mac Con Ulaidh2/19/2001
4147What upset you? I was wrong about the precise price for the Reagan's CaliforMephisto2/18/2001
4146Two wrongs never made a right in my book. Three don't make it any better, noConstant Reader2/18/2001
4145Thanks, Win, I recall the Jackie controversy. I believe she wanted to take more Mephisto2/18/2001
4144I read it, too! Guess what I learned "a longtime Marc Rich lawyer is now Mephisto2/18/2001
4143Hello, Poet, an old friend of ours sent it to me. I never thought he would fall Mephisto2/18/2001
4142Elsewhere in today's paper, there was this piece. High-Stakes Politics: TWin Smith2/18/2001
4141Hello Princess, I'm flattered that you've chosen to post here, after eiPoet2/18/2001
4140.....and here I thought you were going to discuss William J. Clinton's pardoThe Princess2/18/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News