SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Veritas (VRTS)
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
742 72 0 VRTS
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
417Warren Buffett, in my eyes the greatest passive investor there ever was, says thSeeker of Truth-8/7/2000
416You certainly are missing something. This is a very standard phenomenon among coSeeker of Truth-8/7/2000
415My comment is there is few on this message board, articles in the WSJ or elsewhecompounder-8/7/2000
414Market Guide shows negative earnings for VRTS for the last five quarters, startiCharles P. Hubbard-8/7/2000
413<i>Who's left to buy this?</i> Plenty of people are left to buy Seeker of Truth-8/7/2000
412compounder, You said: "It is incredible how the masses have not understoodchomolungma-8/3/2000
411How can you say there has been no improvement when they have been paying off thecompounder-7/29/2000
410VRTS has lost money in each of the last five quarters with no improvement. What Charles P. Hubbard-7/27/2000
409<i>I would rather to continue to bet that a dominant fast growing company Robert Douglas-7/27/2000
408You are right that VRTS could get cut in half, it has happened quite a few timescompounder-7/26/2000
407<i>As you said Leslie guided the street higher, to over 60% growth for theRobert Douglas-7/21/2000
406Did you catch the rueters report on wider than expected loss and slower growth, compounder-7/19/2000
405I saw $101 in after hours then up over $110 after conference call. Someone coulcompounder-7/18/2000
404I think the selloff was due to a rumor that the ceo cleared up on cc..I wouldn&#Venkie-7/18/2000
403Overreaction, as usual.Guy E. Fleming-7/18/2000
402VRTS declares 13 c earnings - Street was looking for 12 c - but whisper was 14c!Ram Seetharaman-7/18/2000
401 I must agree that accountants do not value intellectual properties, so purchasecompounder-6/12/2000
400 Businessmen wouldn't say Veritas overpaid since they paid something less thSeeker of Truth-6/11/2000
399 I do not understand your point. Are you saying that if VRTS had not overpaid foCharles P. Hubbard-6/11/2000
398 I am age 75 and I invest for the long term because it is impossible for me (andSeeker of Truth-6/10/2000
397 Speaking of still losing money, does anyone know when the whole Seagate deal wicompounder-6/6/2000
396 VRTS has a gap at about 127, but it still demonstrates strong behavior. AlthougCharles P. Hubbard-6/5/2000
395 Although I have a different outlook for the stock, I would be interested in howcompounder-6/5/2000
394 Interesting: I too am becoming bearish; However I am not ready to throw the tSkyDart-5/30/2000
393 I don't have a position in VRTS, but it was hot today. Probably a good placCharles P. Hubbard-5/30/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News