REVERSE SPLITS ! Mad as Hell not Going to Take It

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks
REVERSE SPLITS ! Mad as Hell not Going to Take It

An SI Board Since July 1998

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
217	8	0

Emcee: SnakeCharmer	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
42	Which is one reason I would like to MAKE the S.E.C. start enforcing shareholder	K A Anderson	-	7/5/1998
41	You're absolutely right. For an interesting trail of failed companies all	Janice Shell	-	7/5/1998
40	Agreed, its sort of strange but most of these OTC companies never really go ban	K A Anderson	-	7/5/1998
39	I think that simply requiring companies to reduce the number of authorized shar	Janice Shell	-	7/5/1998
38	I have a solution to bringing the OTC Reverse splits to a grinding halt. Actual	K A Anderson	-	7/5/1998
37	Good point, but does that speak at all as to WHY the sun rises in the east?	LegalBeast	-	7/5/1998
36	Correlation indeed does not infer causality. However, if I look out my window	TraderGreg	-	7/5/1998
35	SNAKE IF THE COMPANY HAS GOOD ### BEFORE THE REVERSE and THE STOCK	FRANK J CATALANO	-	7/5/1998
34	I can't comment on the authorized shares in a forward split, but I can abso	TraderGreg	-	7/5/1998
33	I'll be interested to see what you find out. I aksed a lawyer friend about	Janice Shell	-	7/4/1998
32	Janice, correlation does not infer causality. I have been involved in two where	LegalBeast	-	7/4/1998
31	Sorry, but my understanding is that it's not. Number of authorized shares	Janice Shell	-	7/4/1998
30	Great post BUT... There is one thing wrong with what you have said and that i	LegalBeast	-	7/4/1998
29	Frank, you said....<i>A REVERSE SPLIT CAN DO WONDERS FOR THE STOCK PRIC	SnakeCharmer	-	7/4/1998
28	JANICE IF THEY ARE DOING A REVERSE SPLIT JUST TO STAY IN BUSINESS	FRANK J CATALANO	-	7/4/1998
27	OTC/BB Reverse Splits for the week of 06/29/98-07/02/98 I thought it might be	SnakeCharmer	-	7/4/1998
26	Sure, it happens. Happened to a couple Y2K companies. Did reverse splits foll	Janice Shell	-	7/4/1998
25	JANICE GREAT POST !!BUT ALL REVERSE SPLITS ARE NOT NEGATIVE FOR SH	FRANK J CATALANO	-	7/4/1998
24	good post I'll be back learned something already,there's a warning sign	GC	-	7/4/1998
23	Bill, $75 is pretty cheap tuition for what is can be a very expensive lesson.	SnakeCharmer	-	7/4/1998
22	As some or most of you seem to forget 3300 OTC stocks are under notice to compl	Harold Feller	-	7/4/1998
21	The good old R/S........... I have seen one company benefit from a reverse spl	lakers17	-	7/4/1998
20	No reverse split in store here. FNTN is at 0.64 as of this posting.Watch out	dharampal luthra	-	7/4/1998
19	<i> I would have big questions about any company executive who starting	TraderGreg	-	7/4/1998
18	Ciao Janice, You were right, great thread. If you are right the signs are ther	Jacomo	-	7/3/1998

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):