SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
42787 270 0
Emcee:  Chris Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
42037>>When outnumbered, play defence and fight dirty.<< sounds like Niedennis michael patterson-2/5/2001
42036I am not really bullish on NTAP since it has broken extremely important support.Lee Lichterman III-2/5/2001
42035Paul,CNBC is claiming it's about 15% FWIW.Would be nice to know;in the mean Daveyk-2/5/2001
42034Nice job Lee! Very nice. I haven't owned NTAP in a while. Perhaps it's tdennis michael patterson-2/5/2001
42033^NDX 3:13PM -0.72% N/A EXDS 3:00PM -16.17% 17,232,900 ABGX 2:59PM -8.83% 1,417,4Lee Lichterman III-2/5/2001
42032Never got an answer on the effect of the Nasdaq trade counting changes on volumePaul Shread-2/5/2001
42031By L3_Aka_L3 on Monday, February 05, 2001 - 02:36 pm: Edit It was one heck of Lee Lichterman III-2/5/2001
42030Thanks for the correction. It should be 2496. That's even better as it givesPeace-2/5/2001
42029Peace 2496 for .618 retracement for the Naz, not 2596, if I calculate well.Also,sirinam-2/5/2001
42028Hi Paul, Did you ever get a good response to your question last week about voludawgfan2000-2/5/2001
42027Good point, Peace; further than 61.8% and it becomes a trend in its own right.Paul Shread-2/5/2001
42026Jan, >>>> Started last week(not sure the exact day), the Naz stoppedonald sew-2/5/2001
42025Hi Don, At 2596, the COMP has retraced .618 of the entire rise from the 1/3 lowPeace-2/5/2001
42024Jeffery, >>>> And, of course you understand that since I don't donald sew-2/5/2001
42023Tabler, Im suspecting that the failure of the rally will be after a rally that donald sew-2/5/2001
42022Does anyone have a site that reports market news in a timely manner during the dadcpres-2/5/2001
42021Jeffery, If you want to express a point, I would prefer to stick to specifics. donald sew-2/5/2001
42020Jeffery, If you want to express a point, I would prefer to stick to specifics. donald sew-2/5/2001
42019Chris, One thing about the divergence on that DJIA weekly chart. I would suspecJohn Pitera-2/5/2001
42018And, of course you understand that since I don't think there was a "recDoo-2/5/2001
42017when do you think that fail will materialize?timers-2/5/2001
42016Jeffery, I did not ignore the possiblity of that small Head & Shoulder on tdonald sew-2/5/2001
42015Tabler, I havent ignored those issues you mentioned. Yes, and the rally will edonald sew-2/5/2001
42014Thanks, Allan. Looks like selling may be picking up a little here.Paul Shread-2/5/2001
42013<i>where its just not rising on declining volume.</i> Don, just in Jan Crawley-2/5/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News