SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
PALM - The rebirth of Palm Inc.
An SI Board Since September 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
6784 120 0
Emcee:  Tim McGee Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4209CB: While you are correct that Palm has been component constrained for the lastDavid E. Taylor-3/15/2001
4208Tom: Thanks, I forgot in writing that post that VIIx's are a US market onlyDavid E. Taylor-3/15/2001
4207PALM MARKET DOMINATION anything over 50% (Monopolys are considered effective at Crystal ball-3/15/2001
4206techweb.commatt dillabough-3/15/2001
4205SONY leading with new PALM color CLIE handheld. PALM keeps expanding its MARKETCrystal ball-3/15/2001
4204PALM rebounding UPWARDS nicely today, even the cellphones and other wireless areCrystal ball-3/15/2001
4203David: As per your questions: <i>Do the sales numbers you have been postTom R. Clarksburg-3/15/2001
4202<i>I'm curious to learn what metrics investors are using.</i> IWin-Lose-Draw-3/15/2001
4201<i>Is 2.4 too high as compare to 1.5?</i> An even more important quWin-Lose-Draw-3/15/2001
4200<i>If I am wrong with all my supposed "hype"</i> Hype is Win-Lose-Draw-3/15/2001
4199Tom: A couple of brief questions based on your replies to Tim: <i>I justDavid E. Taylor-3/15/2001
4198Palm Valuation: Mang, I'm not suggesting that Palm should be valued on a PKevRupert-3/15/2001
4197Ad, In a bear market environment which we are in now, bears had been really quiMang Cheng-3/15/2001
4196Advalorem, Don't kill the messenger before he has proven himself. If I amTom R. Clarksburg-3/14/2001
4195Tim, in answer to your questions: <i>Why did Palm have so many units to sTom R. Clarksburg-3/14/2001
4194Tom, one final question: You have apparently performed a lot of sales research KevRupert-3/14/2001
4193Palm Forecast -- Am I Unrealistic? <b> Tom - you indicated the following: KevRupert-3/14/2001
4192"Palm Under Pressure" multexinvestor.com This is a positive article KevRupert-3/14/2001
4191Re: Japanese forced sales... What's to stop Japanese banks from continuing opalapril-3/14/2001
4190<i>In replace your cellphone with a Smartphone with PALM in it</i> Win-Lose-Draw-3/14/2001
4189Short Covering BUY ON CLOSE ORDERS, PALM is okay. I am still ahead nicely. JapCrystal ball-3/14/2001
4188Tom, With all due respect to your model, it is very generous. I know you have dTim McGee-3/14/2001
4187Only JAPAN Selling, NOW Specialists and Institutions are BUYING, its going back Crystal ball-3/14/2001
4186CB David, et al: NASD coming back...PALM off slightly ---- and did you check oFNS-3/14/2001
4185Its only JAPAN Selling, NOW Specialists and Institutions are BUYING, its going bCrystal ball-3/14/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):